Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU

<span>This paper explores how the European Commission promotes the concept of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning (SUMP) among European cities. Despite the strong uptake of the SUMP concept, mobility-related problems persist in European municipalities. Linking theoretical approaches to underst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefan Werland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8436
id doaj-a208a46cec6544a2b328bd33534cfdf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a208a46cec6544a2b328bd33534cfdf22020-11-25T03:42:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-10-01128436843610.3390/su12208436Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EUStefan Werland0Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany<span>This paper explores how the European Commission promotes the concept of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning (SUMP) among European cities. Despite the strong uptake of the SUMP concept, mobility-related problems persist in European municipalities. Linking theoretical approaches to understand the diffusion of policies with empirical findings from working with cities in the SUMP context, this article explores channels of policy diffusion and investigates shortcomings related to the respective approaches. Studies on the diffusion, the transfer and the convergence of policies identify formal hierarchy, coercion, competition, learning and networking, and the diffusion of international norms as channels for policy transfer. The findings which are presented in this paper are twofold: First, the paper finds evidence that the Commission takes different roles and uses all mechanisms in parallel, albeit with different intensity. It concludes that the approaches to explain policy diffusion are not competing or mutually exclusive but are applied by the same actor to address different aspects of a policy field, or to reach out to different actors. Second, the article provides first evidence of factors that limit the mechanisms’ abilities to directly influence urban mobility systems and mobility behaviour</span>.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8436sustainable urban mobility planningsumppolicy diffusionpolicy transferparadigmurban mobility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Werland
spellingShingle Stefan Werland
Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
Sustainability
sustainable urban mobility planning
sump
policy diffusion
policy transfer
paradigm
urban mobility
author_facet Stefan Werland
author_sort Stefan Werland
title Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
title_short Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
title_full Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
title_fullStr Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
title_full_unstemmed Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU
title_sort diffusing sustainable urban mobility planning in the eu
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-10-01
description <span>This paper explores how the European Commission promotes the concept of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning (SUMP) among European cities. Despite the strong uptake of the SUMP concept, mobility-related problems persist in European municipalities. Linking theoretical approaches to understand the diffusion of policies with empirical findings from working with cities in the SUMP context, this article explores channels of policy diffusion and investigates shortcomings related to the respective approaches. Studies on the diffusion, the transfer and the convergence of policies identify formal hierarchy, coercion, competition, learning and networking, and the diffusion of international norms as channels for policy transfer. The findings which are presented in this paper are twofold: First, the paper finds evidence that the Commission takes different roles and uses all mechanisms in parallel, albeit with different intensity. It concludes that the approaches to explain policy diffusion are not competing or mutually exclusive but are applied by the same actor to address different aspects of a policy field, or to reach out to different actors. Second, the article provides first evidence of factors that limit the mechanisms’ abilities to directly influence urban mobility systems and mobility behaviour</span>.
topic sustainable urban mobility planning
sump
policy diffusion
policy transfer
paradigm
urban mobility
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8436
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanwerland diffusingsustainableurbanmobilityplanningintheeu
_version_ 1724525760252739584