Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
Perceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above'...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-a24199048bde489eb6bfc8eda7beff4c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a24199048bde489eb6bfc8eda7beff4c2020-11-25T01:50:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011110e016314110.1371/journal.pone.0163141Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?Lei YuanDavid UttalSteven FranconeriPerceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above' or 'below' are extracted by shifting visual attention upward or downward in space. If so, then shifts of attention should improve the representation of spatial relations, compared to a control condition of identity memory. Participants viewed a pair of briefly flashed objects and were then tested on either the relative spatial relation or identity of one of those objects. Using eye tracking to reveal participants' voluntary shifts of attention over time, we found that when initial fixation was on neither object, relational memory showed an absolute advantage for the object following an attention shift, while identity memory showed no advantage for either object. This result is consistent with the shift account of relation processing. When initial fixation began on one of the objects, identity memory strongly benefited this fixated object, while relational memory only showed a relative benefit for objects following an attention shift. This result is also consistent, although not as uniquely, with the shift account of relation processing. Taken together, we suggest that the attention shift account provides a mechanistic explanation for the overall results. This account can potentially serve as the common mechanism underlying both linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lei Yuan David Uttal Steven Franconeri |
spellingShingle |
Lei Yuan David Uttal Steven Franconeri Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Lei Yuan David Uttal Steven Franconeri |
author_sort |
Lei Yuan |
title |
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? |
title_short |
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? |
title_full |
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? |
title_fullStr |
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects? |
title_sort |
are categorical spatial relations encoded by shifting visual attention between objects? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Perceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above' or 'below' are extracted by shifting visual attention upward or downward in space. If so, then shifts of attention should improve the representation of spatial relations, compared to a control condition of identity memory. Participants viewed a pair of briefly flashed objects and were then tested on either the relative spatial relation or identity of one of those objects. Using eye tracking to reveal participants' voluntary shifts of attention over time, we found that when initial fixation was on neither object, relational memory showed an absolute advantage for the object following an attention shift, while identity memory showed no advantage for either object. This result is consistent with the shift account of relation processing. When initial fixation began on one of the objects, identity memory strongly benefited this fixated object, while relational memory only showed a relative benefit for objects following an attention shift. This result is also consistent, although not as uniquely, with the shift account of relation processing. Taken together, we suggest that the attention shift account provides a mechanistic explanation for the overall results. This account can potentially serve as the common mechanism underlying both linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relations. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leiyuan arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects AT daviduttal arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects AT stevenfranconeri arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects |
_version_ |
1725001181835558912 |