Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?

Perceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Yuan, David Uttal, Steven Franconeri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render
id doaj-a24199048bde489eb6bfc8eda7beff4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a24199048bde489eb6bfc8eda7beff4c2020-11-25T01:50:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011110e016314110.1371/journal.pone.0163141Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?Lei YuanDavid UttalSteven FranconeriPerceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above' or 'below' are extracted by shifting visual attention upward or downward in space. If so, then shifts of attention should improve the representation of spatial relations, compared to a control condition of identity memory. Participants viewed a pair of briefly flashed objects and were then tested on either the relative spatial relation or identity of one of those objects. Using eye tracking to reveal participants' voluntary shifts of attention over time, we found that when initial fixation was on neither object, relational memory showed an absolute advantage for the object following an attention shift, while identity memory showed no advantage for either object. This result is consistent with the shift account of relation processing. When initial fixation began on one of the objects, identity memory strongly benefited this fixated object, while relational memory only showed a relative benefit for objects following an attention shift. This result is also consistent, although not as uniquely, with the shift account of relation processing. Taken together, we suggest that the attention shift account provides a mechanistic explanation for the overall results. This account can potentially serve as the common mechanism underlying both linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lei Yuan
David Uttal
Steven Franconeri
spellingShingle Lei Yuan
David Uttal
Steven Franconeri
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lei Yuan
David Uttal
Steven Franconeri
author_sort Lei Yuan
title Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
title_short Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
title_full Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
title_fullStr Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
title_full_unstemmed Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
title_sort are categorical spatial relations encoded by shifting visual attention between objects?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Perceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above' or 'below' are extracted by shifting visual attention upward or downward in space. If so, then shifts of attention should improve the representation of spatial relations, compared to a control condition of identity memory. Participants viewed a pair of briefly flashed objects and were then tested on either the relative spatial relation or identity of one of those objects. Using eye tracking to reveal participants' voluntary shifts of attention over time, we found that when initial fixation was on neither object, relational memory showed an absolute advantage for the object following an attention shift, while identity memory showed no advantage for either object. This result is consistent with the shift account of relation processing. When initial fixation began on one of the objects, identity memory strongly benefited this fixated object, while relational memory only showed a relative benefit for objects following an attention shift. This result is also consistent, although not as uniquely, with the shift account of relation processing. Taken together, we suggest that the attention shift account provides a mechanistic explanation for the overall results. This account can potentially serve as the common mechanism underlying both linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047635?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT leiyuan arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects
AT daviduttal arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects
AT stevenfranconeri arecategoricalspatialrelationsencodedbyshiftingvisualattentionbetweenobjects
_version_ 1725001181835558912