Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development

Youth’s structured (e.g., sports) and unstructured (e.g., socializing) activities are key contexts for positive development. Both behavioral participation (e.g., frequency) and elements of psychological engagement (e.g., enjoyment, challenge) in programs and activities have been linked to components...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heather L. Ramey, Heather L. Lawford, Linda Rose-Krasnor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Youth Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/769
id doaj-a24f3a6d31134b5bb3ac32292ae1047f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a24f3a6d31134b5bb3ac32292ae1047f2020-11-25T01:34:22ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of Youth Development2325-40172019-09-011438810910.5195/jyd.2019.769587Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth DevelopmentHeather L. Ramey0Heather L. Lawford1Linda Rose-Krasnor2Humber Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Brock University, Centre of Excellence for Youth EngagementBishop’s University, Brock University, Centre of Excellence for Youth EngagementBrock UniversityYouth’s structured (e.g., sports) and unstructured (e.g., socializing) activities are key contexts for positive development. Both behavioral participation (e.g., frequency) and elements of psychological engagement (e.g., enjoyment, challenge) in programs and activities have been linked to components of youth development. We tested a model in which both psychological engagement and behavioral participation in activities predicted overall positive youth development in older adolescent and emerging adult samples (Sample 1, n = 235, mean age = 18.7 years, SD = 1.4 years, 67.7% female; Sample 2, n = 186, mean age = 20.0 years, SD = 2.1 years, 68.8% female). In the first known study to include behavioral participation and multidimensional psychological engagement in predicting the Five Cs of positive youth development, we found that greater psychological engagement, but not behavioral participation, was related to higher positive youth development across samples and different activity types. Findings suggest that promoting youth’s psychological engagement in programs and other activities, rather than just their physical presence, may be advantageous for strengthening positive youth development.http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/769psychological engagementactivity participationpositive youth developmentemerging adultsyouth engagement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heather L. Ramey
Heather L. Lawford
Linda Rose-Krasnor
spellingShingle Heather L. Ramey
Heather L. Lawford
Linda Rose-Krasnor
Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
Journal of Youth Development
psychological engagement
activity participation
positive youth development
emerging adults
youth engagement
author_facet Heather L. Ramey
Heather L. Lawford
Linda Rose-Krasnor
author_sort Heather L. Ramey
title Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
title_short Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
title_full Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
title_fullStr Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Engagement and Behavioral Activity Participation As Predictors of Positive Youth Development
title_sort psychological engagement and behavioral activity participation as predictors of positive youth development
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of Youth Development
issn 2325-4017
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Youth’s structured (e.g., sports) and unstructured (e.g., socializing) activities are key contexts for positive development. Both behavioral participation (e.g., frequency) and elements of psychological engagement (e.g., enjoyment, challenge) in programs and activities have been linked to components of youth development. We tested a model in which both psychological engagement and behavioral participation in activities predicted overall positive youth development in older adolescent and emerging adult samples (Sample 1, n = 235, mean age = 18.7 years, SD = 1.4 years, 67.7% female; Sample 2, n = 186, mean age = 20.0 years, SD = 2.1 years, 68.8% female). In the first known study to include behavioral participation and multidimensional psychological engagement in predicting the Five Cs of positive youth development, we found that greater psychological engagement, but not behavioral participation, was related to higher positive youth development across samples and different activity types. Findings suggest that promoting youth’s psychological engagement in programs and other activities, rather than just their physical presence, may be advantageous for strengthening positive youth development.
topic psychological engagement
activity participation
positive youth development
emerging adults
youth engagement
url http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/769
work_keys_str_mv AT heatherlramey psychologicalengagementandbehavioralactivityparticipationaspredictorsofpositiveyouthdevelopment
AT heatherllawford psychologicalengagementandbehavioralactivityparticipationaspredictorsofpositiveyouthdevelopment
AT lindarosekrasnor psychologicalengagementandbehavioralactivityparticipationaspredictorsofpositiveyouthdevelopment
_version_ 1725072751500197888