Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8 |
id |
doaj-a289ea21768b434a85abb44ee68439dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a289ea21768b434a85abb44ee68439dd2020-11-24T21:13:29ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152017-12-011511910.1186/s12916-017-0972-8Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the ruleJudith Verduijn0Josine E. Verhoeven1Yuri Milaneschi2Robert A. Schoevers3Albert M. van Hemert4Aartjan T. F. Beekman5Brenda W. J. H. Penninx6Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterAbstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. Methods Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). Results With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. Conclusions Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8Major depressive disorderAffective disorderAnxiety disorderCoursePrognosisLongitudinal |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Judith Verduijn Josine E. Verhoeven Yuri Milaneschi Robert A. Schoevers Albert M. van Hemert Aartjan T. F. Beekman Brenda W. J. H. Penninx |
spellingShingle |
Judith Verduijn Josine E. Verhoeven Yuri Milaneschi Robert A. Schoevers Albert M. van Hemert Aartjan T. F. Beekman Brenda W. J. H. Penninx Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule BMC Medicine Major depressive disorder Affective disorder Anxiety disorder Course Prognosis Longitudinal |
author_facet |
Judith Verduijn Josine E. Verhoeven Yuri Milaneschi Robert A. Schoevers Albert M. van Hemert Aartjan T. F. Beekman Brenda W. J. H. Penninx |
author_sort |
Judith Verduijn |
title |
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_short |
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_full |
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_fullStr |
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_sort |
reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medicine |
issn |
1741-7015 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. Methods Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). Results With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. Conclusions Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate. |
topic |
Major depressive disorder Affective disorder Anxiety disorder Course Prognosis Longitudinal |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT judithverduijn reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT josineeverhoeven reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT yurimilaneschi reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT robertaschoevers reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT albertmvanhemert reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT aartjantfbeekman reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT brendawjhpenninx reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule |
_version_ |
1716749002475569152 |