Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judith Verduijn, Josine E. Verhoeven, Yuri Milaneschi, Robert A. Schoevers, Albert M. van Hemert, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8
id doaj-a289ea21768b434a85abb44ee68439dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a289ea21768b434a85abb44ee68439dd2020-11-24T21:13:29ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152017-12-011511910.1186/s12916-017-0972-8Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the ruleJudith Verduijn0Josine E. Verhoeven1Yuri Milaneschi2Robert A. Schoevers3Albert M. van Hemert4Aartjan T. F. Beekman5Brenda W. J. H. Penninx6Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical CenterAbstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. Methods Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). Results With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. Conclusions Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8Major depressive disorderAffective disorderAnxiety disorderCoursePrognosisLongitudinal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Judith Verduijn
Josine E. Verhoeven
Yuri Milaneschi
Robert A. Schoevers
Albert M. van Hemert
Aartjan T. F. Beekman
Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
spellingShingle Judith Verduijn
Josine E. Verhoeven
Yuri Milaneschi
Robert A. Schoevers
Albert M. van Hemert
Aartjan T. F. Beekman
Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
BMC Medicine
Major depressive disorder
Affective disorder
Anxiety disorder
Course
Prognosis
Longitudinal
author_facet Judith Verduijn
Josine E. Verhoeven
Yuri Milaneschi
Robert A. Schoevers
Albert M. van Hemert
Aartjan T. F. Beekman
Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
author_sort Judith Verduijn
title Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
title_short Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
title_full Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
title_fullStr Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
title_sort reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
publisher BMC
series BMC Medicine
issn 1741-7015
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. Methods Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). Results With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. Conclusions Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate.
topic Major depressive disorder
Affective disorder
Anxiety disorder
Course
Prognosis
Longitudinal
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8
work_keys_str_mv AT judithverduijn reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT josineeverhoeven reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT yurimilaneschi reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT robertaschoevers reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT albertmvanhemert reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT aartjantfbeekman reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
AT brendawjhpenninx reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule
_version_ 1716749002475569152