Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables

The atmospheric mercury concentration in Europe was simulated with the regional atmospheric chemistry transport model CMAQ-Hg. Two sets of meteorological fields, one from MM5 and one from COSMO-CLM (CCLM) were used to drive the model. The results differ significantly, in particular gaseous elemental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias V., Aulinger A., Bieser J., Quante M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2013-04-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006
id doaj-a2af5459a82a44e6b80cb4ddd07bde70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2af5459a82a44e6b80cb4ddd07bde702021-02-02T03:29:06ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422013-04-0112700610.1051/e3sconf/20130127006Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variablesMatthias V.Aulinger A.Bieser J.Quante M.The atmospheric mercury concentration in Europe was simulated with the regional atmospheric chemistry transport model CMAQ-Hg. Two sets of meteorological fields, one from MM5 and one from COSMO-CLM (CCLM) were used to drive the model. The results differ significantly, in particular gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) concentrations are much lower in the run with meteorological fields from MM5 compared to the run with CCLM meteorology. Looking at the mercury sinks within the model domain, it was found that dry deposition of Hg0 is the main sink in both model runs. Remarkably, dry deposition velocities are much higher when calculated with MM5 meteorological fields. Wet deposition of oxidized mercury is a factor of 5-6 lower than dry deposition of Hg0. In CMAQ with MM5 meteorology wet deposition is about afactor of two higher compared to the run with CCLM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006mercurychemistry transport modelingdepositionmeteorological fields
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthias V.
Aulinger A.
Bieser J.
Quante M.
spellingShingle Matthias V.
Aulinger A.
Bieser J.
Quante M.
Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
E3S Web of Conferences
mercury
chemistry transport modeling
deposition
meteorological fields
author_facet Matthias V.
Aulinger A.
Bieser J.
Quante M.
author_sort Matthias V.
title Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
title_short Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
title_full Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
title_fullStr Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
title_full_unstemmed Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
title_sort regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: impact of meteorological variables
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2013-04-01
description The atmospheric mercury concentration in Europe was simulated with the regional atmospheric chemistry transport model CMAQ-Hg. Two sets of meteorological fields, one from MM5 and one from COSMO-CLM (CCLM) were used to drive the model. The results differ significantly, in particular gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) concentrations are much lower in the run with meteorological fields from MM5 compared to the run with CCLM meteorology. Looking at the mercury sinks within the model domain, it was found that dry deposition of Hg0 is the main sink in both model runs. Remarkably, dry deposition velocities are much higher when calculated with MM5 meteorological fields. Wet deposition of oxidized mercury is a factor of 5-6 lower than dry deposition of Hg0. In CMAQ with MM5 meteorology wet deposition is about afactor of two higher compared to the run with CCLM.
topic mercury
chemistry transport modeling
deposition
meteorological fields
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasv regionalmodelingofatmosphericmercuryimpactofmeteorologicalvariables
AT aulingera regionalmodelingofatmosphericmercuryimpactofmeteorologicalvariables
AT bieserj regionalmodelingofatmosphericmercuryimpactofmeteorologicalvariables
AT quantem regionalmodelingofatmosphericmercuryimpactofmeteorologicalvariables
_version_ 1724307638688153600