Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?
Purpose: To analyze the diagnostic criteria used in the scientific literature published in the past 25 years for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions and to explore if the epidemiological analysis of diagnostic validity has been used to propose which clinical criteria should be use...
Main Authors: | Pilar Cacho-Martínez, Ángel García-Muñoz, María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Optometry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429613000058 |
Similar Items
-
Do we really know the prevalence of accomodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?
by: Pilar Cacho-Martínez, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies
by: Ángel García-Muñoz, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Clinical profile of nonstrabismic binocular vision anomalies in patients with asthenopia in North-East India
by: Damaris Magdalene, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Study of the Effects of Accommodative Insufficiency Therapy (SEA IT)
by: Shasteen, Nahrain Mary
Published: (2012) -
Comparison of Binocular Vision Parameters Pre- and Post-EPILASIK Laser Vision Correction Surgery for Myopia in a Pilot Study – Can Vision Therapy Augment Refractive Results?
by: Radhika Natarajan, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)