Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units

Abstract Background Acute psychiatric wards in Germany are often locked due to the assumption that opening could endanger patients and society. On the contrary, some findings suggest that aversive events such as absconding and attempted suicides do not occur more often on wards with an open-door pol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa K. Schreiber, Florian G. Metzger, Tobias A. Duncker, Andreas J. Fallgatter, Tilman Steinert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-019-2126-3
id doaj-a2d3aa3e86cd4b1f92087d66ebc0c35a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2d3aa3e86cd4b1f92087d66ebc0c35a2020-11-25T03:23:28ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2019-05-011911810.1186/s12888-019-2126-3Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care unitsLisa K. Schreiber0Florian G. Metzger1Tobias A. Duncker2Andreas J. Fallgatter3Tilman Steinert4University Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy TuebingenUniversity Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy TuebingenFalkenried Caduceus KlinikUniversity Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy TuebingenCenters for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Ulm UniversityAbstract Background Acute psychiatric wards in Germany are often locked due to the assumption that opening could endanger patients and society. On the contrary, some findings suggest that aversive events such as absconding and attempted suicides do not occur more often on wards with an open-door policy. However, these data are probably biased with regard to differing patient populations on open and locked wards. To our best knowledge, the present study is the first prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design dealing with this issue. Methods This study investigates whether indicators of an open-door policy, as measured by a priori determined outcomes, can be improved by a defined complex intervention on two intervention wards in two psychiatric hospitals, compared to two control wards with otherwise very similar conditions. Both hospitals contain two wards identical in structure and patient admittance policies, so that a similar study protocol can be followed with similar patient populations. Both hospitals have a defined catchment area and receive voluntary and involuntary admissions. In a baseline phase, wards will be opened facultatively (i.e., if it seems possible to staff). In the following intervention period, one ward per hospital will establish an enhanced open-door policy by applying additional strategic and personnel support. As a control group, the control ward will continue to be opened facultatively. After one year, control wards will be opened according to the open-door policy as well. Interventions will include the continuous identification of patients at risk as well as the development of individual care concepts and additional staffing. For this purpose, nursing and medical staff will be methodically supported on an ongoing basis by study staff. Outcomes variables will be the percentage of door opening on each ward between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., the percentage of all treatment days with the door opened and the number of involuntary treatment days with open doors. Data on frequencies of aggressive incidents, absconding, police searches, and seclusion or restraint will be used as control variables. Additional costs will be calculated. Discussion Treating mentally ill patients on locked wards is a highly relevant and critically discussed topic. In particular, it is controversially discussed whether changes in door policy can be established without increasing risks to patients and others. This study aims to gain robust data on this issue, going beyond beliefs and questionable retrospective observational studies. Trial registration Our trial “Open Doors By Fair Means” is retrospectively registered with DRKS (DRKS00015154) on Sept. 10th 2018 and displayed on the public web site. It is searchable via its Meta-registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-019-2126-3SafetyWardPsychiatryAbscondingCoercive measuresCompulsory treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa K. Schreiber
Florian G. Metzger
Tobias A. Duncker
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Tilman Steinert
spellingShingle Lisa K. Schreiber
Florian G. Metzger
Tobias A. Duncker
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Tilman Steinert
Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
BMC Psychiatry
Safety
Ward
Psychiatry
Absconding
Coercive measures
Compulsory treatment
author_facet Lisa K. Schreiber
Florian G. Metzger
Tobias A. Duncker
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Tilman Steinert
author_sort Lisa K. Schreiber
title Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
title_short Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
title_full Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
title_fullStr Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
title_full_unstemmed Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open Ward policy in acute care units
title_sort open doors by fair means: study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards an open ward policy in acute care units
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background Acute psychiatric wards in Germany are often locked due to the assumption that opening could endanger patients and society. On the contrary, some findings suggest that aversive events such as absconding and attempted suicides do not occur more often on wards with an open-door policy. However, these data are probably biased with regard to differing patient populations on open and locked wards. To our best knowledge, the present study is the first prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design dealing with this issue. Methods This study investigates whether indicators of an open-door policy, as measured by a priori determined outcomes, can be improved by a defined complex intervention on two intervention wards in two psychiatric hospitals, compared to two control wards with otherwise very similar conditions. Both hospitals contain two wards identical in structure and patient admittance policies, so that a similar study protocol can be followed with similar patient populations. Both hospitals have a defined catchment area and receive voluntary and involuntary admissions. In a baseline phase, wards will be opened facultatively (i.e., if it seems possible to staff). In the following intervention period, one ward per hospital will establish an enhanced open-door policy by applying additional strategic and personnel support. As a control group, the control ward will continue to be opened facultatively. After one year, control wards will be opened according to the open-door policy as well. Interventions will include the continuous identification of patients at risk as well as the development of individual care concepts and additional staffing. For this purpose, nursing and medical staff will be methodically supported on an ongoing basis by study staff. Outcomes variables will be the percentage of door opening on each ward between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., the percentage of all treatment days with the door opened and the number of involuntary treatment days with open doors. Data on frequencies of aggressive incidents, absconding, police searches, and seclusion or restraint will be used as control variables. Additional costs will be calculated. Discussion Treating mentally ill patients on locked wards is a highly relevant and critically discussed topic. In particular, it is controversially discussed whether changes in door policy can be established without increasing risks to patients and others. This study aims to gain robust data on this issue, going beyond beliefs and questionable retrospective observational studies. Trial registration Our trial “Open Doors By Fair Means” is retrospectively registered with DRKS (DRKS00015154) on Sept. 10th 2018 and displayed on the public web site. It is searchable via its Meta-registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/).
topic Safety
Ward
Psychiatry
Absconding
Coercive measures
Compulsory treatment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-019-2126-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lisakschreiber opendoorsbyfairmeansstudyprotocolfora3yearprospectivecontrolledstudywithaquasiexperimentaldesigntowardsanopenwardpolicyinacutecareunits
AT floriangmetzger opendoorsbyfairmeansstudyprotocolfora3yearprospectivecontrolledstudywithaquasiexperimentaldesigntowardsanopenwardpolicyinacutecareunits
AT tobiasaduncker opendoorsbyfairmeansstudyprotocolfora3yearprospectivecontrolledstudywithaquasiexperimentaldesigntowardsanopenwardpolicyinacutecareunits
AT andreasjfallgatter opendoorsbyfairmeansstudyprotocolfora3yearprospectivecontrolledstudywithaquasiexperimentaldesigntowardsanopenwardpolicyinacutecareunits
AT tilmansteinert opendoorsbyfairmeansstudyprotocolfora3yearprospectivecontrolledstudywithaquasiexperimentaldesigntowardsanopenwardpolicyinacutecareunits
_version_ 1724606102133276672