Dosimeters: measuring occupational UV exposure's involvement in skin cancer development

• Main Authors: Adrian I. Lungu, Alexandra I. Butacu, Ionela Manole, Alina Suru, George S. Țiplica, Carmen M. Sălăvăstru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Publishing House 2017-04-01
• Series: Romanian Journal of Military Medicine
• Subjects: ultraviolet radiation; occupational exposure; skin cancer
• Online Access: http://revistamedicinamilitara.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/RJMM-vol-CXX-nr-1-din-2017-Chapter8.pdf
• ISSN: 1222-5126; 2501-2312

Introduction: Solar exposure is a major causative factor for multiple skin pathologies. Even though UV radiation is the most important factor implicated in skin cancer pathogenesis, still, few European countries recognize UV occupational-induced skin cancer as an occupational disease, Romania not being part of this category. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the UV exposure doses in agriculture and construction workers and to establish efficient protective measures. Materials and methods: In our Department, a prospective, observational, analytical study was conducted, including six outdoor workers (in construction and agriculture), over a period of three summer months (July, August, September). Subjects were asked to wear personal dosimeters and the following parameters were analyzed: profession, duration of exposure, UV exposure doses, skin aspect, preexisting preventive measures. Results: The wearing of dosimeters was well tolerated by all subjects, without any interference with daily professional activities. Daily UV radiation doses ranged from 1.79 SED (tractor driver) to 19 SED (agriculture worker). Maximum UVR doses were recorded between 10:00 am and 4 pm. Clinical examination was made after measurements, with no detectable skin changes. Conclusion: Even though workers in agriculture and construction in Romania are exposed to significant UV doses, with 40% more than the general population, these professions are not recognized as high-risk professions for developing skin tumors. More prospective and retrospective studies are necessary for more significant statistical results and for demonstrating the necessity of introducing primary, secondary and tertiary preventive measures.