Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations

Abstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikola N. Radovanović, Siniša U. Pavlović, Bratislav Kirćanski, Nemanja Branković, Nikola Vujadinović, Vojislav Sajić, Ana Milašinović, Vesna Bisenić, Mirjana Živković, Goran Milašinović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864
id doaj-a2e4750e9b244d189891da4cebe322b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2e4750e9b244d189891da4cebe322b82021-09-02T11:42:07ZengWileyAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology1082-720X1542-474X2021-09-01265n/an/a10.1111/anec.12864Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitationsNikola N. Radovanović0Siniša U. Pavlović1Bratislav Kirćanski2Nemanja Branković3Nikola Vujadinović4Vojislav Sajić5Ana Milašinović6Vesna Bisenić7Mirjana Živković8Goran Milašinović9Pacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaAbstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. Results The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. Conclusions ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864arrhythmiaimplantable loop recorderpalpitationssyncope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikola N. Radovanović
Siniša U. Pavlović
Bratislav Kirćanski
Nemanja Branković
Nikola Vujadinović
Vojislav Sajić
Ana Milašinović
Vesna Bisenić
Mirjana Živković
Goran Milašinović
spellingShingle Nikola N. Radovanović
Siniša U. Pavlović
Bratislav Kirćanski
Nemanja Branković
Nikola Vujadinović
Vojislav Sajić
Ana Milašinović
Vesna Bisenić
Mirjana Živković
Goran Milašinović
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
arrhythmia
implantable loop recorder
palpitations
syncope
author_facet Nikola N. Radovanović
Siniša U. Pavlović
Bratislav Kirćanski
Nemanja Branković
Nikola Vujadinović
Vojislav Sajić
Ana Milašinović
Vesna Bisenić
Mirjana Živković
Goran Milašinović
author_sort Nikola N. Radovanović
title Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
title_short Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
title_full Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
title_sort diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
publisher Wiley
series Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
issn 1082-720X
1542-474X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. Results The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. Conclusions ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.
topic arrhythmia
implantable loop recorder
palpitations
syncope
url https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolanradovanovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT sinisaupavlovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT bratislavkircanski diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT nemanjabrankovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT nikolavujadinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT vojislavsajic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT anamilasinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT vesnabisenic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT mirjanazivkovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
AT goranmilasinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations
_version_ 1721175887236300800