Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
Abstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864 |
id |
doaj-a2e4750e9b244d189891da4cebe322b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a2e4750e9b244d189891da4cebe322b82021-09-02T11:42:07ZengWileyAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology1082-720X1542-474X2021-09-01265n/an/a10.1111/anec.12864Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitationsNikola N. Radovanović0Siniša U. Pavlović1Bratislav Kirćanski2Nemanja Branković3Nikola Vujadinović4Vojislav Sajić5Ana Milašinović6Vesna Bisenić7Mirjana Živković8Goran Milašinović9Pacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaPacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaAbstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. Results The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. Conclusions ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864arrhythmiaimplantable loop recorderpalpitationssyncope |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikola N. Radovanović Siniša U. Pavlović Bratislav Kirćanski Nemanja Branković Nikola Vujadinović Vojislav Sajić Ana Milašinović Vesna Bisenić Mirjana Živković Goran Milašinović |
spellingShingle |
Nikola N. Radovanović Siniša U. Pavlović Bratislav Kirćanski Nemanja Branković Nikola Vujadinović Vojislav Sajić Ana Milašinović Vesna Bisenić Mirjana Živković Goran Milašinović Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology arrhythmia implantable loop recorder palpitations syncope |
author_facet |
Nikola N. Radovanović Siniša U. Pavlović Bratislav Kirćanski Nemanja Branković Nikola Vujadinović Vojislav Sajić Ana Milašinović Vesna Bisenić Mirjana Živković Goran Milašinović |
author_sort |
Nikola N. Radovanović |
title |
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_short |
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_full |
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_sort |
diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology |
issn |
1082-720X 1542-474X |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. Methods This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. Results The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. Conclusions ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process. |
topic |
arrhythmia implantable loop recorder palpitations syncope |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikolanradovanovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT sinisaupavlovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT bratislavkircanski diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT nemanjabrankovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT nikolavujadinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT vojislavsajic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT anamilasinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT vesnabisenic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT mirjanazivkovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT goranmilasinovic diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations |
_version_ |
1721175887236300800 |