Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imagi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celebi Aksuyek S, Yalcin Hulya, Yalcin Fatih
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Online Access:http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/8/1/19
id doaj-a2f634d626fd44d0a1b6036c6c5e73a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2f634d626fd44d0a1b6036c6c5e73a42020-11-25T00:03:10ZengBMCCardiovascular Ultrasound1476-71202010-06-01811910.1186/1476-7120-8-19Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular massCelebi Aksuyek SYalcin HulyaYalcin Fatih<p>Abstract</p> <p>Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imaging modalities. Despite inherent limitations, conventional echocardiography has fundamentally been established as most widely used diagnostic tool. 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now feasible, fast and accurate for LV mass evaluation. 3DE is also superior to conventional echocardiography in terms of LV mass assessment, especially in patients with abnormal LV geometry. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) are currently performed for LV mass assessment and also do not depend on cardiac geometry and display 3-dimensional data, as well. Therefore, CMR is being increasingly employed and is at the present standard of reference in the clinical setting. Although each method demonstrates advantages over another, there are also disadvantages to receive attention. Diagnostic accuracy of methods will also be increased with the introduction of more advanced systems. It is also likely that in the coming years new and more accurate diagnostic tests will become available. In particular, CMR and CCT have been intersecting hot topic between cardiology and radiology clinics. Thus, good communication and collaboration between two specialties is required for selection of an appropriate test.</p> http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/8/1/19
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celebi Aksuyek S
Yalcin Hulya
Yalcin Fatih
spellingShingle Celebi Aksuyek S
Yalcin Hulya
Yalcin Fatih
Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
author_facet Celebi Aksuyek S
Yalcin Hulya
Yalcin Fatih
author_sort Celebi Aksuyek S
title Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_short Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_full Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_fullStr Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_full_unstemmed Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_sort current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
publisher BMC
series Cardiovascular Ultrasound
issn 1476-7120
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imaging modalities. Despite inherent limitations, conventional echocardiography has fundamentally been established as most widely used diagnostic tool. 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now feasible, fast and accurate for LV mass evaluation. 3DE is also superior to conventional echocardiography in terms of LV mass assessment, especially in patients with abnormal LV geometry. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) are currently performed for LV mass assessment and also do not depend on cardiac geometry and display 3-dimensional data, as well. Therefore, CMR is being increasingly employed and is at the present standard of reference in the clinical setting. Although each method demonstrates advantages over another, there are also disadvantages to receive attention. Diagnostic accuracy of methods will also be increased with the introduction of more advanced systems. It is also likely that in the coming years new and more accurate diagnostic tests will become available. In particular, CMR and CCT have been intersecting hot topic between cardiology and radiology clinics. Thus, good communication and collaboration between two specialties is required for selection of an appropriate test.</p>
url http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/8/1/19
work_keys_str_mv AT celebiaksuyeks currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass
AT yalcinhulya currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass
AT yalcinfatih currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass
_version_ 1725434630685851648