Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries

The article deals with the problem of the proprial status of ethnonyms as reflected in Russian explanatory dictionaries from the first relevant editions of the last quarter of the 19th century (the unfinished experimental Comprehensive Philological Dictionary by Aleksandr Orlov, 1884–1885) till the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleksandr I. Grishchenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2013-12-01
Series:Voprosy Onomastiki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/VO_2013_2(15)/Grishchenko%20Onomastic_2_2013_sm-8.pdf
id doaj-a30b5ca05b02401e9fdd814eea99f941
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a30b5ca05b02401e9fdd814eea99f9412020-11-24T22:34:21ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaVoprosy Onomastiki1994-24001994-24512013-12-01102146163Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory DictionariesAleksandr I. Grishchenko0Moscow State Pedagogical UniversityThe article deals with the problem of the proprial status of ethnonyms as reflected in Russian explanatory dictionaries from the first relevant editions of the last quarter of the 19th century (the unfinished experimental Comprehensive Philological Dictionary by Aleksandr Orlov, 1884–1885) till the newest Great Academic Dictionary of the Russian Language (2004–). Interpreted as appellatives, ethnonyms were gradually included in explanatory dictionaries, their spelling being at the same time codified with lowercase letters. The dictionary definitions of ethnonyms do not always distinguish them from the related lexical category of inhabitants’ names. Russian ethnonymy as reflected in dictionaries gives evidence of lexicographers’ attempts to comply with the contemporary ethnological data, but these attempts are often overshadowed by the naive idea of ethnicity. Nevertheless, this idea of ethnicity has some heuristic potential for being fixed by the language itself, hence for the purpose of this article we adopt a wide interpretation of ethnicity where ethnonyms are names of all groups of people regarded as “peoples”, “nations”, “tribes” etc.http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/VO_2013_2(15)/Grishchenko%20Onomastic_2_2013_sm-8.pdfRussian languageethnonymsinhabitants’ nameslexicographysemanticsethnicity
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksandr I. Grishchenko
spellingShingle Aleksandr I. Grishchenko
Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
Voprosy Onomastiki
Russian language
ethnonyms
inhabitants’ names
lexicography
semantics
ethnicity
author_facet Aleksandr I. Grishchenko
author_sort Aleksandr I. Grishchenko
title Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
title_short Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
title_full Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
title_fullStr Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
title_full_unstemmed Russian Ethnonyms and Related Lexical Categories in Explanatory Dictionaries
title_sort russian ethnonyms and related lexical categories in explanatory dictionaries
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
series Voprosy Onomastiki
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
publishDate 2013-12-01
description The article deals with the problem of the proprial status of ethnonyms as reflected in Russian explanatory dictionaries from the first relevant editions of the last quarter of the 19th century (the unfinished experimental Comprehensive Philological Dictionary by Aleksandr Orlov, 1884–1885) till the newest Great Academic Dictionary of the Russian Language (2004–). Interpreted as appellatives, ethnonyms were gradually included in explanatory dictionaries, their spelling being at the same time codified with lowercase letters. The dictionary definitions of ethnonyms do not always distinguish them from the related lexical category of inhabitants’ names. Russian ethnonymy as reflected in dictionaries gives evidence of lexicographers’ attempts to comply with the contemporary ethnological data, but these attempts are often overshadowed by the naive idea of ethnicity. Nevertheless, this idea of ethnicity has some heuristic potential for being fixed by the language itself, hence for the purpose of this article we adopt a wide interpretation of ethnicity where ethnonyms are names of all groups of people regarded as “peoples”, “nations”, “tribes” etc.
topic Russian language
ethnonyms
inhabitants’ names
lexicography
semantics
ethnicity
url http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/VO_2013_2(15)/Grishchenko%20Onomastic_2_2013_sm-8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandrigrishchenko russianethnonymsandrelatedlexicalcategoriesinexplanatorydictionaries
_version_ 1725727989107261440