Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method

The objectives of this study were to develop a specific formula to estimate age in a Brazilian adult population and to compare the original formula from Cameriere to this Brazilian formula. The sample comprised 1,772 periapical radiographs from 443 subjects (219 men, 224 women) that were organized i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDO, Nathalia Zanini ALVES, Edgard MICHEL-CROSATO, Marcos ROCHA, Roberto CAMERIERE, Maria Gabriela Haye BIAZEVIC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica 2015-01-01
Series:Brazilian Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242015000100215&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-a31f312d5ac5476a8b49f7c662c39dd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a31f312d5ac5476a8b49f7c662c39dd92020-11-24T22:56:02ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica Brazilian Oral Research1807-31072015-01-012911910.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0016S1806-83242015000100215Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s methodAlana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDONathalia Zanini ALVESEdgard MICHEL-CROSATOMarcos ROCHARoberto CAMERIEREMaria Gabriela Haye BIAZEVICThe objectives of this study were to develop a specific formula to estimate age in a Brazilian adult population and to compare the original formula from Cameriere to this Brazilian formula. The sample comprised 1,772 periapical radiographs from 443 subjects (219 men, 224 women) that were organized into 12 groups according to sex (men or women) and age (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 years and older). The films were analyzed using the criteria described by Cameriere et al. (2004) and Adobe Photoshop®. We obtained a mean error of 8.56 (SD = 5.80) years for tooth 13, 7.99 (SD = 5.78) years for tooth 23, 8.38 (SD = 6.26) years for tooth 33, and 8.20 (SD = 6.54) years for tooth 43. When teeth were combined in the analysis, we observed lower mean errors. The Brazilian formula developed from this sample group was more accurate than Cameriere’s formula. However, other factors must be considered to improve age estimates in adults.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242015000100215&lng=en&tlng=enForensic SciencesForensic DentistryAge Determination by Teeth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDO
Nathalia Zanini ALVES
Edgard MICHEL-CROSATO
Marcos ROCHA
Roberto CAMERIERE
Maria Gabriela Haye BIAZEVIC
spellingShingle Alana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDO
Nathalia Zanini ALVES
Edgard MICHEL-CROSATO
Marcos ROCHA
Roberto CAMERIERE
Maria Gabriela Haye BIAZEVIC
Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
Brazilian Oral Research
Forensic Sciences
Forensic Dentistry
Age Determination by Teeth
author_facet Alana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDO
Nathalia Zanini ALVES
Edgard MICHEL-CROSATO
Marcos ROCHA
Roberto CAMERIERE
Maria Gabriela Haye BIAZEVIC
author_sort Alana de Cássia Silva AZEVEDO
title Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
title_short Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
title_full Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
title_fullStr Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
title_full_unstemmed Dental age estimation in a Brazilian adult population using Cameriere’s method
title_sort dental age estimation in a brazilian adult population using cameriere’s method
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
series Brazilian Oral Research
issn 1807-3107
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The objectives of this study were to develop a specific formula to estimate age in a Brazilian adult population and to compare the original formula from Cameriere to this Brazilian formula. The sample comprised 1,772 periapical radiographs from 443 subjects (219 men, 224 women) that were organized into 12 groups according to sex (men or women) and age (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 years and older). The films were analyzed using the criteria described by Cameriere et al. (2004) and Adobe Photoshop®. We obtained a mean error of 8.56 (SD = 5.80) years for tooth 13, 7.99 (SD = 5.78) years for tooth 23, 8.38 (SD = 6.26) years for tooth 33, and 8.20 (SD = 6.54) years for tooth 43. When teeth were combined in the analysis, we observed lower mean errors. The Brazilian formula developed from this sample group was more accurate than Cameriere’s formula. However, other factors must be considered to improve age estimates in adults.
topic Forensic Sciences
Forensic Dentistry
Age Determination by Teeth
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242015000100215&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT alanadecassiasilvaazevedo dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
AT nathaliazaninialves dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
AT edgardmichelcrosato dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
AT marcosrocha dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
AT robertocameriere dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
AT mariagabrielahayebiazevic dentalageestimationinabrazilianadultpopulationusingcamerieresmethod
_version_ 1725655185452171264