Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology

The Basel Accords encourages credit entities to implement their own models for measuring financial risk. In this paper, we focus on the use of internal ratings-based (IRB) models for the assessment of credit risk and, specifically, on one component that models the probability of default (PD). The tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reyes Samaniego Medina, Maria Jose Vazquez Cueto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia 2013-02-01
Series:International Journal of Banking and Finance
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=3f8d6416-65bd-43f4-b6e8-febddbda5bcb
id doaj-a36927a310224429948ecd841bcb1b00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a36927a310224429948ecd841bcb1b002021-06-15T13:16:40ZengUniversiti Utara MalaysiaInternational Journal of Banking and Finance1675-722X2013-02-0110.32890/ijbf2013.10.1.8466Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set MethodologyReyes Samaniego MedinaMaria Jose Vazquez CuetoThe Basel Accords encourages credit entities to implement their own models for measuring financial risk. In this paper, we focus on the use of internal ratings-based (IRB) models for the assessment of credit risk and, specifically, on one component that models the probability of default (PD). The traditional methods used for modelling credit risk, such as discriminant analysis and logit and probit models, start with several statistical restrictions. The rough set methodology avoids these limitations and as such is an alternative to the classic statistical methods. We apply the rough set methodology to a database of 106 companies that are applicants for credit. We obtain ratios that can best discriminate between financially sound and bankrupt companies, along with a series of decision rules that will help detect operations that are potentially in default. Finally, we compare the results obtained using the rough set methodology to those obtained using classic discriminant analysis and logit models. We conclude that the rough set methodology presents better risk classification results.  https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=3f8d6416-65bd-43f4-b6e8-febddbda5bcb
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reyes Samaniego Medina
Maria Jose Vazquez Cueto
spellingShingle Reyes Samaniego Medina
Maria Jose Vazquez Cueto
Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
International Journal of Banking and Finance
author_facet Reyes Samaniego Medina
Maria Jose Vazquez Cueto
author_sort Reyes Samaniego Medina
title Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
title_short Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
title_full Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
title_fullStr Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Credit Risk: An Application of the Rough Set Methodology
title_sort modeling credit risk: an application of the rough set methodology
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia
series International Journal of Banking and Finance
issn 1675-722X
publishDate 2013-02-01
description The Basel Accords encourages credit entities to implement their own models for measuring financial risk. In this paper, we focus on the use of internal ratings-based (IRB) models for the assessment of credit risk and, specifically, on one component that models the probability of default (PD). The traditional methods used for modelling credit risk, such as discriminant analysis and logit and probit models, start with several statistical restrictions. The rough set methodology avoids these limitations and as such is an alternative to the classic statistical methods. We apply the rough set methodology to a database of 106 companies that are applicants for credit. We obtain ratios that can best discriminate between financially sound and bankrupt companies, along with a series of decision rules that will help detect operations that are potentially in default. Finally, we compare the results obtained using the rough set methodology to those obtained using classic discriminant analysis and logit models. We conclude that the rough set methodology presents better risk classification results.  
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=3f8d6416-65bd-43f4-b6e8-febddbda5bcb
work_keys_str_mv AT reyessamaniegomedina modelingcreditriskanapplicationoftheroughsetmethodology
AT mariajosevazquezcueto modelingcreditriskanapplicationoftheroughsetmethodology
_version_ 1721376177374887936