Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease

Background: Music interventions are promising therapies for the management of symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Globally, music interventions can be classified as active or receptive depending on the participation of the subjects. Active and receptive music tasks engage different brain areas tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Gómez-Gallego, Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego, María Gallego-Mellado, Javier García-García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8067
id doaj-a395b56ed7bb4f20b8d198d1f551c90f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a395b56ed7bb4f20b8d198d1f551c90f2021-08-06T15:23:38ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-07-01188067806710.3390/ijerph18158067Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s DiseaseMaría Gómez-Gallego0Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego1María Gallego-Mellado2Javier García-García3Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Saint Anthony, 30100 Murcia, SpainApplied Economics Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, SpainEspinardo Primary Health Care Centre, 30100 Murcia, SpainClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Economics, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, SpainBackground: Music interventions are promising therapies for the management of symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Globally, music interventions can be classified as active or receptive depending on the participation of the subjects. Active and receptive music tasks engage different brain areas that might result in distinctive clinical effects. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of two types of music interventions and a control activity. Methods: Ninety AD patients from six nursing homes participated in the study. Nursing homes were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either active music intervention, receptive music intervention, or the usual care. Effects on cognition, behaviour, daily living activities, and motor function were assessed. Results: Active music intervention improved cognition, behaviour, and functional state in a higher extent than both receptive music intervention and usual care. The effect size of active music intervention for cognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms was large (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.62 and 0.61, respectively), while for functional state, it was small-to-medium sized (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.18). Receptive music intervention had a stabilizing effect on behavioural symptoms compared to control intervention (mean change from baseline ± standard deviation = −0.76 ± 3.66 and 3.35 ± 3.29, respectively). In the active music intervention, the percentage of patients who showed improvement in cognitive deficits (85.7), behavioural symptoms (92.9), and functional state (46.4) was higher than in both receptive listening (11.8, 42.9, and 14.3, respectively) and control group (6.3, 12.2, and 17.1, respectively). Conclusions: Active music intervention is useful to improve symptoms of AD and should be prescribed as a complement to the usual treatment.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8067Alzheimer’s diseasecognitionbehaviourdaily living activitiesmotor functionactive music intervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author María Gómez-Gallego
Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego
María Gallego-Mellado
Javier García-García
spellingShingle María Gómez-Gallego
Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego
María Gallego-Mellado
Javier García-García
Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Alzheimer’s disease
cognition
behaviour
daily living activities
motor function
active music intervention
author_facet María Gómez-Gallego
Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego
María Gallego-Mellado
Javier García-García
author_sort María Gómez-Gallego
title Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort comparative efficacy of active group music intervention versus group music listening in alzheimer’s disease
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background: Music interventions are promising therapies for the management of symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Globally, music interventions can be classified as active or receptive depending on the participation of the subjects. Active and receptive music tasks engage different brain areas that might result in distinctive clinical effects. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of two types of music interventions and a control activity. Methods: Ninety AD patients from six nursing homes participated in the study. Nursing homes were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either active music intervention, receptive music intervention, or the usual care. Effects on cognition, behaviour, daily living activities, and motor function were assessed. Results: Active music intervention improved cognition, behaviour, and functional state in a higher extent than both receptive music intervention and usual care. The effect size of active music intervention for cognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms was large (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.62 and 0.61, respectively), while for functional state, it was small-to-medium sized (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.18). Receptive music intervention had a stabilizing effect on behavioural symptoms compared to control intervention (mean change from baseline ± standard deviation = −0.76 ± 3.66 and 3.35 ± 3.29, respectively). In the active music intervention, the percentage of patients who showed improvement in cognitive deficits (85.7), behavioural symptoms (92.9), and functional state (46.4) was higher than in both receptive listening (11.8, 42.9, and 14.3, respectively) and control group (6.3, 12.2, and 17.1, respectively). Conclusions: Active music intervention is useful to improve symptoms of AD and should be prescribed as a complement to the usual treatment.
topic Alzheimer’s disease
cognition
behaviour
daily living activities
motor function
active music intervention
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8067
work_keys_str_mv AT mariagomezgallego comparativeefficacyofactivegroupmusicinterventionversusgroupmusiclisteninginalzheimersdisease
AT juancandidogomezgallego comparativeefficacyofactivegroupmusicinterventionversusgroupmusiclisteninginalzheimersdisease
AT mariagallegomellado comparativeefficacyofactivegroupmusicinterventionversusgroupmusiclisteninginalzheimersdisease
AT javiergarciagarcia comparativeefficacyofactivegroupmusicinterventionversusgroupmusiclisteninginalzheimersdisease
_version_ 1721218514238308352