Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAMJ
2020-03-01
|
Series: | PAMJ Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf
|
id |
doaj-a3bf7b1020904bdd9f2ebae7520a9d02 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a3bf7b1020904bdd9f2ebae7520a9d022020-11-25T03:28:14ZengPAMJPAMJ Clinical Medicine 2707-27972707-27972020-03-0128210.11604/pamj-cm.2020.2.82.2053220532Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic reviewEshetu Lemma Haile0Gurja Belay Woldemichael1Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo2Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden3Johannes Paul Bogers4 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia NHLS, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU), Pretoria, South Africa Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, WHO Global health library and Popline) to compared HPV detection rate and acceptability of HPV self-vs clinician collected sampling in Africa. Specific search keywords were used. The study only focused on research articles that compared self-vs clinician-collected samples based on HPV testing and its associated data. Eight research articles and a total of 3476 women were included from six countries in Africa continent. The mean age of women was 40.6 years with range of 16-89 years. Aggregately the high risk (HR)-HPV detection rate was 36% (7.2% -84.8%) and 35% (6.8% - 87.8) of self-vs clinician-collected sampling, respectively. The mean differences and variation in detection rates between sampling methods was 2.6% (SD =1.7). There was significant HR-HPV detection rate correlation between two sampling methods with value of R=0.997. The weighted average of kappa agreement was 0.71(0.47 to 0.89) was moderate. Overall women concluded that self-collected sampling method was a preferred method (86.3%), easy to obtained (77.8%), and 76.7% increased cervical cancer screening uptake. The acceptability of self-collected CC sampled HPV testing could be an alternative sampling method and increased the uptake of screening services. Introducing standardized self-sampling techniques and diagnostic assay study in Africa is paramount. https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf hpvself samplesclinician samplescervical cancerscreeningviaafrica |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eshetu Lemma Haile Gurja Belay Woldemichael Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden Johannes Paul Bogers |
spellingShingle |
Eshetu Lemma Haile Gurja Belay Woldemichael Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden Johannes Paul Bogers Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review PAMJ Clinical Medicine hpv self samples clinician samples cervical cancer screening via africa |
author_facet |
Eshetu Lemma Haile Gurja Belay Woldemichael Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden Johannes Paul Bogers |
author_sort |
Eshetu Lemma Haile |
title |
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review |
title_short |
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review |
title_full |
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review |
title_sort |
comparison and acceptability of hpv self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in africa: a systematic review |
publisher |
PAMJ |
series |
PAMJ Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2707-2797 2707-2797 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, WHO Global health library and Popline) to compared HPV detection rate and acceptability of HPV self-vs clinician collected sampling in Africa. Specific search keywords were used. The study only focused on research articles that compared self-vs clinician-collected samples based on HPV testing and its associated data. Eight research articles and a total of 3476 women were included from six countries in Africa continent. The mean age of women was 40.6 years with range of 16-89 years. Aggregately the high risk (HR)-HPV detection rate was 36% (7.2% -84.8%) and 35% (6.8% - 87.8) of self-vs clinician-collected sampling, respectively. The mean differences and variation in detection rates between sampling methods was 2.6% (SD =1.7). There was significant HR-HPV detection rate correlation between two sampling methods with value of R=0.997. The weighted average of kappa agreement was 0.71(0.47 to 0.89) was moderate. Overall women concluded that self-collected sampling method was a preferred method (86.3%), easy to obtained (77.8%), and 76.7% increased cervical cancer screening uptake. The acceptability of self-collected CC sampled HPV testing could be an alternative sampling method and increased the uptake of screening services. Introducing standardized self-sampling techniques and diagnostic assay study in Africa is paramount. |
topic |
hpv self samples clinician samples cervical cancer screening via africa |
url |
https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eshetulemmahaile comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview AT gurjabelaywoldemichael comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview AT ramokonelisbethlebelo comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview AT jeanpierrevangeertruyden comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview AT johannespaulbogers comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724585596328869888 |