Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review

Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eshetu Lemma Haile, Gurja Belay Woldemichael, Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo, Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden, Johannes Paul Bogers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAMJ 2020-03-01
Series:PAMJ Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
hpv
via
Online Access: https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf
id doaj-a3bf7b1020904bdd9f2ebae7520a9d02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3bf7b1020904bdd9f2ebae7520a9d022020-11-25T03:28:14ZengPAMJPAMJ Clinical Medicine 2707-27972707-27972020-03-0128210.11604/pamj-cm.2020.2.82.2053220532Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic reviewEshetu Lemma Haile0Gurja Belay Woldemichael1Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo2Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden3Johannes Paul Bogers4 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia NHLS, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU), Pretoria, South Africa Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, WHO Global health library and Popline) to compared HPV detection rate and acceptability of HPV self-vs clinician collected sampling in Africa. Specific search keywords were used. The study only focused on research articles that compared self-vs clinician-collected samples based on HPV testing and its associated data. Eight research articles and a total of 3476 women were included from six countries in Africa continent. The mean age of women was 40.6 years with range of 16-89 years. Aggregately the high risk (HR)-HPV detection rate was 36% (7.2% -84.8%) and 35% (6.8% - 87.8) of self-vs clinician-collected sampling, respectively. The mean differences and variation in detection rates between sampling methods was 2.6% (SD =1.7). There was significant HR-HPV detection rate correlation between two sampling methods with value of R=0.997. The weighted average of kappa agreement was 0.71(0.47 to 0.89) was moderate. Overall women concluded that self-collected sampling method was a preferred method (86.3%), easy to obtained (77.8%), and 76.7% increased cervical cancer screening uptake. The acceptability of self-collected CC sampled HPV testing could be an alternative sampling method and increased the uptake of screening services. Introducing standardized self-sampling techniques and diagnostic assay study in Africa is paramount. https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf hpvself samplesclinician samplescervical cancerscreeningviaafrica
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eshetu Lemma Haile
Gurja Belay Woldemichael
Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo
Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden
Johannes Paul Bogers
spellingShingle Eshetu Lemma Haile
Gurja Belay Woldemichael
Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo
Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden
Johannes Paul Bogers
Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
PAMJ Clinical Medicine
hpv
self samples
clinician samples
cervical cancer
screening
via
africa
author_facet Eshetu Lemma Haile
Gurja Belay Woldemichael
Ramokone Lisbeth Lebelo
Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden
Johannes Paul Bogers
author_sort Eshetu Lemma Haile
title Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
title_short Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
title_full Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
title_fullStr Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and acceptability of HPV self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in Africa: a systematic review
title_sort comparison and acceptability of hpv self-collected cervical cancer samples versus doctor-collected samples in africa: a systematic review
publisher PAMJ
series PAMJ Clinical Medicine
issn 2707-2797
2707-2797
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Self-collected cervical cancer (CC) samples might be considered alternative strategy and provided an equivalent comparable result on HPV (Human Papillomavirus) detection and acceptability with clinician-collected sampled in Africa. A systematic review was performed using four electronic bibliographic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, WHO Global health library and Popline) to compared HPV detection rate and acceptability of HPV self-vs clinician collected sampling in Africa. Specific search keywords were used. The study only focused on research articles that compared self-vs clinician-collected samples based on HPV testing and its associated data. Eight research articles and a total of 3476 women were included from six countries in Africa continent. The mean age of women was 40.6 years with range of 16-89 years. Aggregately the high risk (HR)-HPV detection rate was 36% (7.2% -84.8%) and 35% (6.8% - 87.8) of self-vs clinician-collected sampling, respectively. The mean differences and variation in detection rates between sampling methods was 2.6% (SD =1.7). There was significant HR-HPV detection rate correlation between two sampling methods with value of R=0.997. The weighted average of kappa agreement was 0.71(0.47 to 0.89) was moderate. Overall women concluded that self-collected sampling method was a preferred method (86.3%), easy to obtained (77.8%), and 76.7% increased cervical cancer screening uptake. The acceptability of self-collected CC sampled HPV testing could be an alternative sampling method and increased the uptake of screening services. Introducing standardized self-sampling techniques and diagnostic assay study in Africa is paramount.
topic hpv
self samples
clinician samples
cervical cancer
screening
via
africa
url https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/2/82/pdf/82.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eshetulemmahaile comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview
AT gurjabelaywoldemichael comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview
AT ramokonelisbethlebelo comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview
AT jeanpierrevangeertruyden comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview
AT johannespaulbogers comparisonandacceptabilityofhpvselfcollectedcervicalcancersamplesversusdoctorcollectedsamplesinafricaasystematicreview
_version_ 1724585596328869888