How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter

Abstract Besides Donald Trump, its most famous user, some 330 million people use Twitter as a platform for communication, much of it political. Yet, given the 280 character limit, how much can you say in a tweet? Although much has already been written about Twitter, little attention has been given t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz, Alexander Nikolaev, Douglas Porpora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2021-05-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00794-x
id doaj-a3c3aed9212e420f9a0686e321e0595d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3c3aed9212e420f9a0686e321e0595d2021-05-16T11:05:33ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922021-05-01811910.1057/s41599-021-00794-xHow much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on TwitterKatarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz0Alexander Nikolaev1Douglas Porpora2Drexel UniversityDrexel UniversityDrexel UniversityAbstract Besides Donald Trump, its most famous user, some 330 million people use Twitter as a platform for communication, much of it political. Yet, given the 280 character limit, how much can you say in a tweet? Although much has already been written about Twitter, little attention has been given to the nature of the argument found there. To begin filling this gap, it is necessary to identify the basic units of such an argument. Identifying them as speech acts, we demonstrate here by discourse analysis how by virtue of the enthymematic quality of public argument, much argument can be communicated even by singular speech acts and even by speech acts other than assertion.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00794-x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz
Alexander Nikolaev
Douglas Porpora
spellingShingle Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz
Alexander Nikolaev
Douglas Porpora
How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
author_facet Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz
Alexander Nikolaev
Douglas Porpora
author_sort Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz
title How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
title_short How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
title_full How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
title_fullStr How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
title_sort how much can you say in a tweet? an approach to political argumentation on twitter
publisher Springer Nature
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
issn 2662-9992
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Besides Donald Trump, its most famous user, some 330 million people use Twitter as a platform for communication, much of it political. Yet, given the 280 character limit, how much can you say in a tweet? Although much has already been written about Twitter, little attention has been given to the nature of the argument found there. To begin filling this gap, it is necessary to identify the basic units of such an argument. Identifying them as speech acts, we demonstrate here by discourse analysis how by virtue of the enthymematic quality of public argument, much argument can be communicated even by singular speech acts and even by speech acts other than assertion.
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00794-x
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynaelliottmaksymowicz howmuchcanyousayinatweetanapproachtopoliticalargumentationontwitter
AT alexandernikolaev howmuchcanyousayinatweetanapproachtopoliticalargumentationontwitter
AT douglasporpora howmuchcanyousayinatweetanapproachtopoliticalargumentationontwitter
_version_ 1721439835972960256