“Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres

Abstract – IT Le categorie di “teatro popolare” e “teatro d'arte” si riferiscono a due ambiti culturali differenti, distinti non soltanto da caratteristiche estetiche di base, ma anche dai loro ruoli e dalle ricadute sociali. Ciascuno comporta specifici riferimenti e tecniche, contesti di spazi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theodoros Grammatas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2013-05-01
Series:Antropologia e Teatro
Subjects:
Online Access:http://antropologiaeteatro.unibo.it/article/view/3695
id doaj-a3edfdea382f4929a51df913c3948ffb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3edfdea382f4929a51df913c3948ffb2020-11-25T00:44:57ZengUniversity of BolognaAntropologia e Teatro2039-22812013-05-014410.6092/issn.2039-2281/36953441“Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genresTheodoros GrammatasAbstract – IT Le categorie di “teatro popolare” e “teatro d'arte” si riferiscono a due ambiti culturali differenti, distinti non soltanto da caratteristiche estetiche di base, ma anche dai loro ruoli e dalle ricadute sociali. Ciascuno comporta specifici riferimenti e tecniche, contesti di spazio e di tempo deputati, strategie di comunicazione sia tra gli artisti, sia tra questi stessi e il pubblico. Ciononostante, malgrado la storica competizione tra cultura bassa e alta, il loro rapporto è sempre stato osmotico e complementare; reciproche influenze hanno costituito un equilibrio in perenne slittamento, nel teatro (e nella cultura) occidentale sin dalle origini rituali. L'autore presenta alcuni esempi, per convalidare tale approccio come prospettiva metodologica negli studi storiografici.  Abstract – EN Categories such “popular” and “artistic” theatre refer to two different cultural fields, which are distinguished not only by their primary aesthetical features, but also by their social roles as well as consequences. Each one of them involves peculiar techniques and references, setting in space and time and strategies of communication, both among the artists and between them and the audience. Nevertheless, despite an historical competition involving low and highbrow culture, the relationship between these two fields is valued as osmotic and complementary; mutual influences have been constituing an ever-shifing balance in Western theatre (and culture) since its ritual origins. The author eventually exposes some examples in order to validate such approach as a methodologic perspective in Western historical Theatre Studies.http://antropologiaeteatro.unibo.it/article/view/3695highbrowpopular theatrewestern culture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Theodoros Grammatas
spellingShingle Theodoros Grammatas
“Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
Antropologia e Teatro
highbrow
popular theatre
western culture
author_facet Theodoros Grammatas
author_sort Theodoros Grammatas
title “Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
title_short “Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
title_full “Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
title_fullStr “Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
title_full_unstemmed “Popular” and “Highbrow” in the theatre. Cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
title_sort “popular” and “highbrow” in the theatre. cultural interaction and osmosis between the genres
publisher University of Bologna
series Antropologia e Teatro
issn 2039-2281
publishDate 2013-05-01
description Abstract – IT Le categorie di “teatro popolare” e “teatro d'arte” si riferiscono a due ambiti culturali differenti, distinti non soltanto da caratteristiche estetiche di base, ma anche dai loro ruoli e dalle ricadute sociali. Ciascuno comporta specifici riferimenti e tecniche, contesti di spazio e di tempo deputati, strategie di comunicazione sia tra gli artisti, sia tra questi stessi e il pubblico. Ciononostante, malgrado la storica competizione tra cultura bassa e alta, il loro rapporto è sempre stato osmotico e complementare; reciproche influenze hanno costituito un equilibrio in perenne slittamento, nel teatro (e nella cultura) occidentale sin dalle origini rituali. L'autore presenta alcuni esempi, per convalidare tale approccio come prospettiva metodologica negli studi storiografici.  Abstract – EN Categories such “popular” and “artistic” theatre refer to two different cultural fields, which are distinguished not only by their primary aesthetical features, but also by their social roles as well as consequences. Each one of them involves peculiar techniques and references, setting in space and time and strategies of communication, both among the artists and between them and the audience. Nevertheless, despite an historical competition involving low and highbrow culture, the relationship between these two fields is valued as osmotic and complementary; mutual influences have been constituing an ever-shifing balance in Western theatre (and culture) since its ritual origins. The author eventually exposes some examples in order to validate such approach as a methodologic perspective in Western historical Theatre Studies.
topic highbrow
popular theatre
western culture
url http://antropologiaeteatro.unibo.it/article/view/3695
work_keys_str_mv AT theodorosgrammatas popularandhighbrowinthetheatreculturalinteractionandosmosisbetweenthegenres
_version_ 1725272254039719936