Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions

This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi, Mark Palmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Diponegoro University 2020-04-01
Series:Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning
Subjects:
uav
Online Access:https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning/article/view/25894
id doaj-a4018bda71254155844b70edee668777
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4018bda71254155844b70edee6687772021-03-12T09:12:36ZengDiponegoro UniversityGeoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning2355-65442020-04-016212213810.14710/geoplanning.6.2.122-13816994Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging ConditionsOluibukun Gbenga Ajayi0Mark Palmer1Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal University of Technology, Minna, PMB 65, Minna, NigeriaUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, United KingdomThis study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval.https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning/article/view/25894unmanned aerial vehiclelidar technologydigital elevation modelterrain modellinglidaruav
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi
Mark Palmer
spellingShingle Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi
Mark Palmer
Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning
unmanned aerial vehicle
lidar technology
digital elevation model
terrain modelling
lidar
uav
author_facet Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi
Mark Palmer
author_sort Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi
title Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
title_short Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
title_full Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
title_fullStr Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions
title_sort modelling 3d topography by comparing airborne lidar data with unmanned aerial system (uas) photogrammetry under multiple imaging conditions
publisher Diponegoro University
series Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning
issn 2355-6544
publishDate 2020-04-01
description This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval.
topic unmanned aerial vehicle
lidar technology
digital elevation model
terrain modelling
lidar
uav
url https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning/article/view/25894
work_keys_str_mv AT oluibukungbengaajayi modelling3dtopographybycomparingairbornelidardatawithunmannedaerialsystemuasphotogrammetryundermultipleimagingconditions
AT markpalmer modelling3dtopographybycomparingairbornelidardatawithunmannedaerialsystemuasphotogrammetryundermultipleimagingconditions
_version_ 1724223078632783872