What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning

Nonreligion is often thought to be commensurate with nihilism or fatalism, resulting in the perception that the nonreligious have no source of meaning in life. While views to this effect have been advanced in various arenas, no empirical evaluation of such a view has been conducted. Using data from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Speed, Thomas J. Coleman, Joseph Langston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017754238
id doaj-a40fa00990fe4564b1a9182688320f99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a40fa00990fe4564b1a9182688320f992020-11-25T03:17:37ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402018-01-01810.1177/2158244017754238What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life MeaningDavid Speed0Thomas J. Coleman1Joseph Langston2Newfoundland & Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, Saint John’s, NL, CanadaCoventry University, UKU.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO, USANonreligion is often thought to be commensurate with nihilism or fatalism, resulting in the perception that the nonreligious have no source of meaning in life. While views to this effect have been advanced in various arenas, no empirical evaluation of such a view has been conducted. Using data from the 2008 American General Social Survey ( N = ~1,200), we investigated whether atheists, the religiously unaffiliated, and persons raised religiously unaffiliated were more likely than theists, the religiously affiliated, and persons raised with a religious affiliation to report greater levels of fatalism, nihilism, and the perception that meaning in life is self-provided. Results suggested that these groups did not differ with regard to fatalism or nihilism. However, atheists and the religiously unaffiliated (but not persons raised in a religiously unaffiliated household) were more likely to indicate that meaning in life was endogenous—that is, self-produced. While atheists and the nonreligious differed from their counterparts on source of meaning in life, this was not associated with any “penalty” for overall existential meaning.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017754238
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Speed
Thomas J. Coleman
Joseph Langston
spellingShingle David Speed
Thomas J. Coleman
Joseph Langston
What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
SAGE Open
author_facet David Speed
Thomas J. Coleman
Joseph Langston
author_sort David Speed
title What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
title_short What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
title_full What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
title_fullStr What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
title_full_unstemmed What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning
title_sort what do you mean, “what does it all mean?” atheism, nonreligion, and life meaning
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Nonreligion is often thought to be commensurate with nihilism or fatalism, resulting in the perception that the nonreligious have no source of meaning in life. While views to this effect have been advanced in various arenas, no empirical evaluation of such a view has been conducted. Using data from the 2008 American General Social Survey ( N = ~1,200), we investigated whether atheists, the religiously unaffiliated, and persons raised religiously unaffiliated were more likely than theists, the religiously affiliated, and persons raised with a religious affiliation to report greater levels of fatalism, nihilism, and the perception that meaning in life is self-provided. Results suggested that these groups did not differ with regard to fatalism or nihilism. However, atheists and the religiously unaffiliated (but not persons raised in a religiously unaffiliated household) were more likely to indicate that meaning in life was endogenous—that is, self-produced. While atheists and the nonreligious differed from their counterparts on source of meaning in life, this was not associated with any “penalty” for overall existential meaning.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017754238
work_keys_str_mv AT davidspeed whatdoyoumeanwhatdoesitallmeanatheismnonreligionandlifemeaning
AT thomasjcoleman whatdoyoumeanwhatdoesitallmeanatheismnonreligionandlifemeaning
AT josephlangston whatdoyoumeanwhatdoesitallmeanatheismnonreligionandlifemeaning
_version_ 1724631051825840128