Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas

Background: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) are challenging tumors. We report a classification system based on our experience of 107 tumors. Materials and Methods: The three main algorithm criteria included the compartment of development of the tumor, its dural insertion, and its relation to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Bruneau, B George
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2010;volume=1;issue=1;spage=10;epage=17;aulast=Bruneau
id doaj-a422a276a1e74c0e9f562cf1ff93ed46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a422a276a1e74c0e9f562cf1ff93ed462020-11-25T00:28:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372010-01-0111101710.4103/0974-8237.65476Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomasM BruneauB GeorgeBackground: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) are challenging tumors. We report a classification system based on our experience of 107 tumors. Materials and Methods: The three main algorithm criteria included the compartment of development of the tumor, its dural insertion, and its relation to the vertebral artery. Results: The compartment of development was most of the time intradural (101/107, 94.4%) and less frequently extradural (3/107, 2.8%) or both intra-extradural. (3/107, 2.8%). When developed inside the intradural compartment, FMMs were subdivided into posterior (6/104, 5.8%), lateral (57/104, 54.8%), and anterior (41/104, 39.4%), if their insertion was respectively posterior to the dentate ligament, anterior to the dentate ligament without or with extension over the midline. Anterior and lateral intradural lesions grew below (77/98, 78.6%), above (16/98, 16.3%), or on both sides (5/98, 5.1%) of the VA. Only three cases of extraduralFMMs (3/107, 2.8%) were resected by an antero-lateral approach while all the other ones (104/107, 97.2%) were removed successfully by a postero-lateral approach. Lower cranial nerves were displaced superiorly in FMM growing below the VA but their position cannot be anticipated in other situations. Conclusions: This classification system helps for defining the best surgical approach but also for anticipating the position of the lower cranial nerves and therefore for reducing the surgical morbidity.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2010;volume=1;issue=1;spage=10;epage=17;aulast=BruneauClassificationforamen magnummeningiomasurgical approachtumor - vertebral artery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Bruneau
B George
spellingShingle M Bruneau
B George
Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Classification
foramen magnum
meningioma
surgical approach
tumor - vertebral artery
author_facet M Bruneau
B George
author_sort M Bruneau
title Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
title_short Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
title_full Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
title_fullStr Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
title_full_unstemmed Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
title_sort classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
issn 0974-8237
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Background: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) are challenging tumors. We report a classification system based on our experience of 107 tumors. Materials and Methods: The three main algorithm criteria included the compartment of development of the tumor, its dural insertion, and its relation to the vertebral artery. Results: The compartment of development was most of the time intradural (101/107, 94.4%) and less frequently extradural (3/107, 2.8%) or both intra-extradural. (3/107, 2.8%). When developed inside the intradural compartment, FMMs were subdivided into posterior (6/104, 5.8%), lateral (57/104, 54.8%), and anterior (41/104, 39.4%), if their insertion was respectively posterior to the dentate ligament, anterior to the dentate ligament without or with extension over the midline. Anterior and lateral intradural lesions grew below (77/98, 78.6%), above (16/98, 16.3%), or on both sides (5/98, 5.1%) of the VA. Only three cases of extraduralFMMs (3/107, 2.8%) were resected by an antero-lateral approach while all the other ones (104/107, 97.2%) were removed successfully by a postero-lateral approach. Lower cranial nerves were displaced superiorly in FMM growing below the VA but their position cannot be anticipated in other situations. Conclusions: This classification system helps for defining the best surgical approach but also for anticipating the position of the lower cranial nerves and therefore for reducing the surgical morbidity.
topic Classification
foramen magnum
meningioma
surgical approach
tumor - vertebral artery
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2010;volume=1;issue=1;spage=10;epage=17;aulast=Bruneau
work_keys_str_mv AT mbruneau classificationsystemofforamenmagnummeningiomas
AT bgeorge classificationsystemofforamenmagnummeningiomas
_version_ 1725334782196318208