Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Schizoaffective disorder (SA) is distinguished from schizophrenia (SZ) based on the presence of prominent mood symptoms over the illness course. Despite this clinical distinction, SA and SZ patients are often combined in research studies, in part because data supporting a distinct pathophysiologica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel H Mathalon, Ralph E Hoffman, Todd D Watson, Ryan M Miller, Brian J Roach, Judith M Ford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.09.070.2009/full
id doaj-a43581cc3c8840db8568a2a3b4e0024f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a43581cc3c8840db8568a2a3b4e0024f2020-11-25T02:04:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612010-01-01310.3389/neuro.09.070.2009809Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorderDaniel H Mathalon0Daniel H Mathalon1Daniel H Mathalon2Ralph E Hoffman3Todd D Watson4Ryan M Miller5Ryan M Miller6Brian J Roach7Brian J Roach8Judith M Ford9Judith M Ford10Judith M Ford11University of CaliforniaVA Medical CenterYale University School of MedicineYale University School of MedicineLewis and Clark CollegeUniversity of CaliforniaVA Medical CenterUniversity of CaliforniaVA Medical CenterUniversity of CaliforniaVA Medical CenterYale University School of MedicineSchizoaffective disorder (SA) is distinguished from schizophrenia (SZ) based on the presence of prominent mood symptoms over the illness course. Despite this clinical distinction, SA and SZ patients are often combined in research studies, in part because data supporting a distinct pathophysiological boundary between the disorders are lacking. Indeed, few studies have addressed whether neurobiological abnormalities associated with SZ, such as the widely replicated reduction and delay of the P300 event-related potential (ERP), are also present in SA. Scalp EEG was acquired from patients with DSM-IV SA (n=15) or SZ (n=22), as well as healthy controls (HC; n=22) to assess the P300 elicited by infrequent target (15%) and task-irrelevant distractor (15%) stimuli in separate auditory and visual “oddball” tasks. P300 amplitude was reduced and delayed in SZ, relative to HC, consistent with prior studies. These SZ abnormalities did not interact with stimulus type (target vs. task-irrelevant distractor) or modality (auditory vs. visual). Across sensory modality and stimulus type, SA patients exhibited normal P300 amplitudes (significantly larger than SZ patients and indistinguishable from HC). However, P300 latency and reaction time were both equivalently delayed in SZ and SA patients, relative to HC. P300 differences between SA and SZ patients could not be accounted for by variation in symptom severity, socio-economic status, education, or illness duration. Although both groups show similar deficits in processing speed, SA patients do not exhibit the P300 amplitude deficits evident in SZ, consistent with an underlying pathophysiological boundary between these disorders.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.09.070.2009/fullSchizophreniaEEGP300event-related potentialschizoaffective disorder
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Ralph E Hoffman
Todd D Watson
Ryan M Miller
Ryan M Miller
Brian J Roach
Brian J Roach
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
spellingShingle Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Ralph E Hoffman
Todd D Watson
Ryan M Miller
Ryan M Miller
Brian J Roach
Brian J Roach
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Schizophrenia
EEG
P300
event-related potential
schizoaffective disorder
author_facet Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Daniel H Mathalon
Ralph E Hoffman
Todd D Watson
Ryan M Miller
Ryan M Miller
Brian J Roach
Brian J Roach
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
Judith M Ford
author_sort Daniel H Mathalon
title Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
title_short Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
title_full Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
title_fullStr Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
title_sort neurophysiological distinction between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Schizoaffective disorder (SA) is distinguished from schizophrenia (SZ) based on the presence of prominent mood symptoms over the illness course. Despite this clinical distinction, SA and SZ patients are often combined in research studies, in part because data supporting a distinct pathophysiological boundary between the disorders are lacking. Indeed, few studies have addressed whether neurobiological abnormalities associated with SZ, such as the widely replicated reduction and delay of the P300 event-related potential (ERP), are also present in SA. Scalp EEG was acquired from patients with DSM-IV SA (n=15) or SZ (n=22), as well as healthy controls (HC; n=22) to assess the P300 elicited by infrequent target (15%) and task-irrelevant distractor (15%) stimuli in separate auditory and visual “oddball” tasks. P300 amplitude was reduced and delayed in SZ, relative to HC, consistent with prior studies. These SZ abnormalities did not interact with stimulus type (target vs. task-irrelevant distractor) or modality (auditory vs. visual). Across sensory modality and stimulus type, SA patients exhibited normal P300 amplitudes (significantly larger than SZ patients and indistinguishable from HC). However, P300 latency and reaction time were both equivalently delayed in SZ and SA patients, relative to HC. P300 differences between SA and SZ patients could not be accounted for by variation in symptom severity, socio-economic status, education, or illness duration. Although both groups show similar deficits in processing speed, SA patients do not exhibit the P300 amplitude deficits evident in SZ, consistent with an underlying pathophysiological boundary between these disorders.
topic Schizophrenia
EEG
P300
event-related potential
schizoaffective disorder
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.09.070.2009/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielhmathalon neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT danielhmathalon neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT danielhmathalon neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT ralphehoffman neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT todddwatson neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT ryanmmiller neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT ryanmmiller neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT brianjroach neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT brianjroach neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT judithmford neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT judithmford neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
AT judithmford neurophysiologicaldistinctionbetweenschizophreniaandschizoaffectivedisorder
_version_ 1724945314715009024