A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy

Objectives: To identify and compare the correlation between cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 200 singleton pregnant women who received antenatal care at Chonburi Hospital during September 1, 2018...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Warinya Jearranaikarn, Teera Siwadune
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2021-03-01
Series:Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/218988/169571/
id doaj-a44183f6e2514b1a965cf295d335bc46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a44183f6e2514b1a965cf295d335bc462021-04-08T04:57:14ZengThe Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsThai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology0857-60842021-03-012926572https://doi.org/10.14456/tjog.2021.9A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during PregnancyWarinya Jearranaikarn0Teera Siwadune1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonburi Hospital, Chonburi, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonburi Hospital, Chonburi, ThailandObjectives: To identify and compare the correlation between cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 200 singleton pregnant women who received antenatal care at Chonburi Hospital during September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler for cervical measurement were performed during 16 to 24 weeks of gestation. Maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy body mass index, history of abortion, history of preterm birth, smoking behavior, alcohol drinking and drug used during pregnancy were collected. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and paired t-test were used to evaluate the correlation and difference between cervical lengths measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler.Results: A total of 200 singleton pregnant women participated in the study. The average cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler were 3.92 ± 0.71 cm. and 3.4 ± 0.73 cm., respectively. The mean difference of both methods was 0.52 cm. (95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.57, p value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler was 0.843.Conclusion: The cervical length measured by cervical ruler was correlated with the cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound. However, the average cervical length measured by cervical ruler was statistically significantly lower than those measured by transvaginal ultrasound.https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/218988/169571/cervical lengthcervical rulertransvaginal ultrasoundspontaneous preterm labor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Warinya Jearranaikarn
Teera Siwadune
spellingShingle Warinya Jearranaikarn
Teera Siwadune
A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
cervical length
cervical ruler
transvaginal ultrasound
spontaneous preterm labor
author_facet Warinya Jearranaikarn
Teera Siwadune
author_sort Warinya Jearranaikarn
title A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
title_short A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
title_full A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
title_fullStr A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Cervical Ruler and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Cervical Length Measurement during Pregnancy
title_sort comparison of cervical ruler and transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length measurement during pregnancy
publisher The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
series Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
issn 0857-6084
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objectives: To identify and compare the correlation between cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 200 singleton pregnant women who received antenatal care at Chonburi Hospital during September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler for cervical measurement were performed during 16 to 24 weeks of gestation. Maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy body mass index, history of abortion, history of preterm birth, smoking behavior, alcohol drinking and drug used during pregnancy were collected. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and paired t-test were used to evaluate the correlation and difference between cervical lengths measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler.Results: A total of 200 singleton pregnant women participated in the study. The average cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler were 3.92 ± 0.71 cm. and 3.4 ± 0.73 cm., respectively. The mean difference of both methods was 0.52 cm. (95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.57, p value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound and cervical ruler was 0.843.Conclusion: The cervical length measured by cervical ruler was correlated with the cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound. However, the average cervical length measured by cervical ruler was statistically significantly lower than those measured by transvaginal ultrasound.
topic cervical length
cervical ruler
transvaginal ultrasound
spontaneous preterm labor
url https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/218988/169571/
work_keys_str_mv AT warinyajearranaikarn acomparisonofcervicalrulerandtransvaginalultrasoundforcervicallengthmeasurementduringpregnancy
AT teerasiwadune acomparisonofcervicalrulerandtransvaginalultrasoundforcervicallengthmeasurementduringpregnancy
AT warinyajearranaikarn comparisonofcervicalrulerandtransvaginalultrasoundforcervicallengthmeasurementduringpregnancy
AT teerasiwadune comparisonofcervicalrulerandtransvaginalultrasoundforcervicallengthmeasurementduringpregnancy
_version_ 1721535417567674368