ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS

The purpose of the article is to conceptualize economic sanctions in terms of international power politics. Legal and economic literature study sanctions by means of legal norms analysis and their impact on economies, companies and corporations. However, this approach misses a political component, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. N. Timofeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2018-07-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/764
id doaj-a445ac5bb4d640dca4b509c59046ea4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a445ac5bb4d640dca4b509c59046ea4b2021-09-21T11:00:07ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992018-07-0102(59)264210.24833/2071-8160-2018-2-59-26-42763ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICSI. N. Timofeev0Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaThe purpose of the article is to conceptualize economic sanctions in terms of international power politics. Legal and economic literature study sanctions by means of legal norms analysis and their impact on economies, companies and corporations. However, this approach misses a political component, specially the one of coercion to comply with international norms or requirements of sanctions’ initiators. Usually sanctions are an instrument of economically advanced states vis a vis developing countries with fragile or vulnerable economy. The very essence of sanctions is determined by the asymmetry of international system in terms of economic capabilities. Such an asymmetry fuels a debate between those who consider sanctions as an effective and legitimate instrument (US, EU and other developed states) and those who believe that only the UN Security Council can be a legal source of sanctions, while others are illegal (supported by Russia, China and several dozens of developing countries). This debate reflects a cleavage on a more fundamental problem – the one of sovereignty and the right to interfere into sovereign affairs of states. Recognition of sanctions’ legitimacy would mean the recognition of the right to interfere into sovereign affairs of the target-states beyond the UN Charter. The article provides a reflection of this debate, stressing on different interpretations of the concept of sanctions.The article makes a distinction between the concept of sanctions and the concept of trade wars. Such disengagement is critically important for understanding sanctions as a political concept. If trade wars are conducted to maximize profits, economic sanctions are used to achieve political goals. This determines the fundamental difference in the relations between business and government: in the case of trade wars, business is the main lobbyist for decisions of state bodies, in case of sanctions, the government is the initiator, and business is forced to adapt to the current situation. In the first case, business acts as a subject, in the second - as an object.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/764economic sanctionstrade warstarget statessanctions’ initiatorssovereigntyhuman rightspolitical theoryinternational ethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. N. Timofeev
spellingShingle I. N. Timofeev
ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
economic sanctions
trade wars
target states
sanctions’ initiators
sovereignty
human rights
political theory
international ethics
author_facet I. N. Timofeev
author_sort I. N. Timofeev
title ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
title_short ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
title_full ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
title_fullStr ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
title_full_unstemmed ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AS A CONCEPT OF POWER POLITICS
title_sort economic sanctions as a concept of power politics
publisher MGIMO University Press
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
issn 2071-8160
2541-9099
publishDate 2018-07-01
description The purpose of the article is to conceptualize economic sanctions in terms of international power politics. Legal and economic literature study sanctions by means of legal norms analysis and their impact on economies, companies and corporations. However, this approach misses a political component, specially the one of coercion to comply with international norms or requirements of sanctions’ initiators. Usually sanctions are an instrument of economically advanced states vis a vis developing countries with fragile or vulnerable economy. The very essence of sanctions is determined by the asymmetry of international system in terms of economic capabilities. Such an asymmetry fuels a debate between those who consider sanctions as an effective and legitimate instrument (US, EU and other developed states) and those who believe that only the UN Security Council can be a legal source of sanctions, while others are illegal (supported by Russia, China and several dozens of developing countries). This debate reflects a cleavage on a more fundamental problem – the one of sovereignty and the right to interfere into sovereign affairs of states. Recognition of sanctions’ legitimacy would mean the recognition of the right to interfere into sovereign affairs of the target-states beyond the UN Charter. The article provides a reflection of this debate, stressing on different interpretations of the concept of sanctions.The article makes a distinction between the concept of sanctions and the concept of trade wars. Such disengagement is critically important for understanding sanctions as a political concept. If trade wars are conducted to maximize profits, economic sanctions are used to achieve political goals. This determines the fundamental difference in the relations between business and government: in the case of trade wars, business is the main lobbyist for decisions of state bodies, in case of sanctions, the government is the initiator, and business is forced to adapt to the current situation. In the first case, business acts as a subject, in the second - as an object.
topic economic sanctions
trade wars
target states
sanctions’ initiators
sovereignty
human rights
political theory
international ethics
url https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/764
work_keys_str_mv AT intimofeev economicsanctionsasaconceptofpowerpolitics
_version_ 1717373560998068224