Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.

When questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners' associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference compre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josiah P J King, Jia E Loy, Hannah Rohde, Martin Corley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229486
id doaj-a463dc7ce0a04858866485f62f21d13f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a463dc7ce0a04858866485f62f21d13f2021-03-03T21:33:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022948610.1371/journal.pone.0229486Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.Josiah P J KingJia E LoyHannah RohdeMartin CorleyWhen questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners' associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference comprehension, suggesting that the manner of spoken delivery influences pragmatic judgements concurrently with the processing of lexical information. Here, we investigate the integration of a speaker's gestures into judgements of deception, and ask if and when associations between nonverbal cues and deception emerge. Participants saw and heard a video of a potentially dishonest speaker describe treasure hidden behind an object, while also viewing images of both the named object and a distractor object. Their task was to click on the object behind which they believed the treasure to actually be hidden. Eye and mouse movements were recorded. Experiment 1 investigated listeners' associations between visual cues and deception, using a variety of static and dynamic cues. Experiment 2 focused on adaptor gestures. We show that a speaker's nonverbal behaviour can have a rapid and direct influence on listeners' pragmatic judgements, supporting the idea that communication is fundamentally multimodal.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229486
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Josiah P J King
Jia E Loy
Hannah Rohde
Martin Corley
spellingShingle Josiah P J King
Jia E Loy
Hannah Rohde
Martin Corley
Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Josiah P J King
Jia E Loy
Hannah Rohde
Martin Corley
author_sort Josiah P J King
title Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
title_short Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
title_full Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
title_fullStr Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
title_sort interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description When questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners' associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference comprehension, suggesting that the manner of spoken delivery influences pragmatic judgements concurrently with the processing of lexical information. Here, we investigate the integration of a speaker's gestures into judgements of deception, and ask if and when associations between nonverbal cues and deception emerge. Participants saw and heard a video of a potentially dishonest speaker describe treasure hidden behind an object, while also viewing images of both the named object and a distractor object. Their task was to click on the object behind which they believed the treasure to actually be hidden. Eye and mouse movements were recorded. Experiment 1 investigated listeners' associations between visual cues and deception, using a variety of static and dynamic cues. Experiment 2 focused on adaptor gestures. We show that a speaker's nonverbal behaviour can have a rapid and direct influence on listeners' pragmatic judgements, supporting the idea that communication is fundamentally multimodal.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229486
work_keys_str_mv AT josiahpjking interpretingnonverbalcuestodeceptioninrealtime
AT jiaeloy interpretingnonverbalcuestodeceptioninrealtime
AT hannahrohde interpretingnonverbalcuestodeceptioninrealtime
AT martincorley interpretingnonverbalcuestodeceptioninrealtime
_version_ 1714816288041205760