Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.

<h4>Background</h4>Use of a risk of bias (ROB) tool has been encouraged and advocated to reviewers writing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Selective outcome reporting and other sources of bias are included in the Cochrane ROB tool. It is important to know how this speci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yali Liu, Shengping Yang, Junjie Dai, Yongteng Xu, Rui Zhang, Huaili Jiang, Xianxia Yan, Kehu Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22174772/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-a467ff62bc2745daaed506f3f292f7ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a467ff62bc2745daaed506f3f292f7ef2021-03-04T01:16:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01612e2813010.1371/journal.pone.0028130Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.Yali LiuShengping YangJunjie DaiYongteng XuRui ZhangHuaili JiangXianxia YanKehu Yang<h4>Background</h4>Use of a risk of bias (ROB) tool has been encouraged and advocated to reviewers writing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Selective outcome reporting and other sources of bias are included in the Cochrane ROB tool. It is important to know how this specific tool for assessing ROB has been applied since its release. Our objectives were to evaluate whether and to what extent the new Cochrane ROB tool has been used in Chinese journal papers of acupuncture.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched CBM, TCM database, CJFD, CSJD, and the Wanfang Database from inception to March 2011. Two reviewers independently selected SRs that primarily focused on acupuncture and moxibustion, from which the data was extracted and analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 836 SRs were identified from the search, of which, 105 were included and four are awaiting assessment. Thirty-six of the 105 SRs were published before release of the Cochrane ROB tool (up to 2009). Most used the Cochrane Handbook 4.2 or Jadad's scale for risk or quality assessment. From 2009 to March 2011 69 SRs were identified. While "risk of bias" was reported for approximately two-thirds of SRs, only two SRs mentioned use of a "risk of bias tool" in their assessment. Only 5.8% (4/69) of reviews reported information on all six domains which are involved in the ROB tool. A risk of bias graph/summary figure was provided in 2.9% (2/69) of reviews. Most SRs gave information about sequence generation, allocation concealment, blindness, and incomplete outcome data, however, few reviews (5.8%; 4/69) described selective reporting or other potential sources of bias.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The Cochrane "risk of bias" tool has not been used in all SRs/MAs of acupuncture published in Chinese Journals after 2008. When the ROB tool was used, reporting of relevant information was often incomplete.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22174772/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yali Liu
Shengping Yang
Junjie Dai
Yongteng Xu
Rui Zhang
Huaili Jiang
Xianxia Yan
Kehu Yang
spellingShingle Yali Liu
Shengping Yang
Junjie Dai
Yongteng Xu
Rui Zhang
Huaili Jiang
Xianxia Yan
Kehu Yang
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yali Liu
Shengping Yang
Junjie Dai
Yongteng Xu
Rui Zhang
Huaili Jiang
Xianxia Yan
Kehu Yang
author_sort Yali Liu
title Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
title_short Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
title_full Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
title_fullStr Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
title_full_unstemmed Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
title_sort risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in chinese journals.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Use of a risk of bias (ROB) tool has been encouraged and advocated to reviewers writing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Selective outcome reporting and other sources of bias are included in the Cochrane ROB tool. It is important to know how this specific tool for assessing ROB has been applied since its release. Our objectives were to evaluate whether and to what extent the new Cochrane ROB tool has been used in Chinese journal papers of acupuncture.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched CBM, TCM database, CJFD, CSJD, and the Wanfang Database from inception to March 2011. Two reviewers independently selected SRs that primarily focused on acupuncture and moxibustion, from which the data was extracted and analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 836 SRs were identified from the search, of which, 105 were included and four are awaiting assessment. Thirty-six of the 105 SRs were published before release of the Cochrane ROB tool (up to 2009). Most used the Cochrane Handbook 4.2 or Jadad's scale for risk or quality assessment. From 2009 to March 2011 69 SRs were identified. While "risk of bias" was reported for approximately two-thirds of SRs, only two SRs mentioned use of a "risk of bias tool" in their assessment. Only 5.8% (4/69) of reviews reported information on all six domains which are involved in the ROB tool. A risk of bias graph/summary figure was provided in 2.9% (2/69) of reviews. Most SRs gave information about sequence generation, allocation concealment, blindness, and incomplete outcome data, however, few reviews (5.8%; 4/69) described selective reporting or other potential sources of bias.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The Cochrane "risk of bias" tool has not been used in all SRs/MAs of acupuncture published in Chinese Journals after 2008. When the ROB tool was used, reporting of relevant information was often incomplete.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22174772/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT yaliliu riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT shengpingyang riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT junjiedai riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT yongtengxu riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT ruizhang riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT huailijiang riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT xianxiayan riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
AT kehuyang riskofbiastoolinsystematicreviewsmetaanalysesofacupunctureinchinesejournals
_version_ 1714809632813219840