Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

• Main Authors: Jaewoo Kwon, Ki Byung Song, Seo Young Park, Dakyum Shin, Sarang Hong, Yejong Park, Woohyung Lee, Jae Hoon Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
• Series: Cancers
• Subjects: pancreatic cancer; pancreatoduodenectomy; minimally invasive surgery
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/4/982

<i>Background:</i> Few studies have compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). <i>Methods</i>: A retrospective review of patients undergoing MIPD and OPD for PDAC from January 2011 to December 2017 was performed. Perioperative, oncological, and survival outcomes were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). <i>Results</i>: Data from 1048 patients were evaluated (76 MIPD, 972 OPD). After PSM, 73 patients undergoing MIPD were matched with 219 patients undergoing OPD. Operation times were longer for MIPD than OPD (392 vs. 327 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Postoperative hospital stays were shorter for MIPD patients than OPD patients (12.4 vs. 14.2 days, <i>p</i> = 0.040). The rate of overall complications and postoperative pancreatic fistula did not differ between the two groups. Adjuvant treatment rates were higher following MIPD (80.8% vs. 59.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). With the exception of perineural invasion, no differences were seen between the two groups in pathological outcomes. The median overall survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: MIPD showed shorter postoperative hospital stays and comparable perioperative and oncological outcomes to OPD for selected PDAC patients. Future randomized studies will be required to validate these findings.