Box-and-arrow explanations need not be more abstract than neuroscientific mechanism descriptions
The nature of the relationship between box-and-arrow (BA) explanations and neuroscientific mechanism descriptions (NMDs) is a key foundational issue for cognitive science. In this article we attempt to identify the nature of the constraints imposed by BA explanations on the formulation of NMDs. On t...
Main Authors: | Edoardo eDatteri, Federico eLaudisa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00464/full |
Similar Items
-
Cajal and Pavlov: a comparison between two central neuroscientific schools of the 20th century
by: Carlos Alberto Blanco
Published: (2014-11-01) -
Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review
by: Darby Aono, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Neuromanagement. What about emotion and communication?
by: Michela Balconi, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Deconstructing the
seductive allure of neuroscience explanations
by: Deena Skolnick Weisberg, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Causal explanations within weak and incomplete theories
by: Nikolai eAxmacher
Published: (2015-11-01)