Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia

This paper reports on the design and implementation of a multi-phase interactive process among a set of scientists, policy makers, land managers, and community representatives, so as to facilitate communication, mutual understanding, and participative decision making. This was part of the Ecosystem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven J. Cork, Wendy Proctor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athabasca University Press 2005-01-01
Series:Journal of Research Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v1.2/cork.html
id doaj-a4be92c93651463dae2f1f63cbc5973e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4be92c93651463dae2f1f63cbc5973e2020-11-25T00:48:44ZengAthabasca University Press Journal of Research Practice1712-851X2005-01-0112M6Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, AustraliaSteven J. CorkWendy ProctorThis paper reports on the design and implementation of a multi-phase interactive process among a set of scientists, policy makers, land managers, and community representatives, so as to facilitate communication, mutual understanding, and participative decision making. This was part of the Ecosystem Services Project in Australia. The project sought to broaden public understanding about the natural ecosystems in Australia. The study reported here pertains to one of the project sites--the Goulburn Broken catchment, a highly productive agricultural watershed in the south-east of Australia. The paper demonstrates how, starting from a condition of diversity of ideas and interests among the participants, systematic dialogue and mutual learning could be generated, leading to identification of options for more sustainable land management practices. The concept of “ecosystem services” was used as an integrative tool across disciplines and community perspectives. The concept of scenarios was used to encourage future-focussed thinking among the participants. The idea of “stakeholder jury” was used to promote deliberation. A process of multi-criteria evaluation was used to facilitate convergence of viewpoints, through informed trade-offs and compromises. This experience led to the development of a process for integration research, which helped in harmonising across diverse understandings and values in a transparent and structured manner.http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v1.2/cork.htmlecosystem servicesresearch partnershipsdeliberative multi-criteria evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven J. Cork
Wendy Proctor
spellingShingle Steven J. Cork
Wendy Proctor
Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
Journal of Research Practice
ecosystem services
research partnerships
deliberative multi-criteria evaluation
author_facet Steven J. Cork
Wendy Proctor
author_sort Steven J. Cork
title Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
title_short Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
title_full Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
title_fullStr Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a Process for Integration Research: Ecosystem Services Project, Australia
title_sort implementing a process for integration research: ecosystem services project, australia
publisher Athabasca University Press
series Journal of Research Practice
issn 1712-851X
publishDate 2005-01-01
description This paper reports on the design and implementation of a multi-phase interactive process among a set of scientists, policy makers, land managers, and community representatives, so as to facilitate communication, mutual understanding, and participative decision making. This was part of the Ecosystem Services Project in Australia. The project sought to broaden public understanding about the natural ecosystems in Australia. The study reported here pertains to one of the project sites--the Goulburn Broken catchment, a highly productive agricultural watershed in the south-east of Australia. The paper demonstrates how, starting from a condition of diversity of ideas and interests among the participants, systematic dialogue and mutual learning could be generated, leading to identification of options for more sustainable land management practices. The concept of “ecosystem services” was used as an integrative tool across disciplines and community perspectives. The concept of scenarios was used to encourage future-focussed thinking among the participants. The idea of “stakeholder jury” was used to promote deliberation. A process of multi-criteria evaluation was used to facilitate convergence of viewpoints, through informed trade-offs and compromises. This experience led to the development of a process for integration research, which helped in harmonising across diverse understandings and values in a transparent and structured manner.
topic ecosystem services
research partnerships
deliberative multi-criteria evaluation
url http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v1.2/cork.html
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenjcork implementingaprocessforintegrationresearchecosystemservicesprojectaustralia
AT wendyproctor implementingaprocessforintegrationresearchecosystemservicesprojectaustralia
_version_ 1725254581588328448