Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of protozoa concentration on methane emission from ruminants. A database was built from 59 publications reporting data from 76 in vivo experiments. The experiments included in the database recorded methane production and rumen protozoa concentrat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Guyader, M. Eugène, P. Nozière, D.P. Morgavi, M. Doreau, C. Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114001852
id doaj-a4d7bfc82cb94cc7aaf5238d3f354bc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4d7bfc82cb94cc7aaf5238d3f354bc92021-06-06T04:50:16ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112014-01-0181118161825Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approachJ. Guyader0M. Eugène1P. Nozière2D.P. Morgavi3M. Doreau4C. Martin5INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceINRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceINRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceINRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceINRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceINRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceA meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of protozoa concentration on methane emission from ruminants. A database was built from 59 publications reporting data from 76 in vivo experiments. The experiments included in the database recorded methane production and rumen protozoa concentration measured on the same groups of animals. Quantitative data such as diet chemical composition, rumen fermentation and microbial parameters, and qualitative information such as methane mitigation strategies were also collected. In the database, 31% of the experiments reported a concomitant reduction of both protozoa concentration and methane emission (g/kg dry matter intake). Nearly all of these experiments tested lipids as methane mitigation strategies. By contrast, 21% of the experiments reported a variation in methane emission without changes in protozoa numbers, indicating that methanogenesis is also regulated by other mechanisms not involving protozoa. Experiments that used chemical compounds as an antimethanogenic treatment belonged to this group. The relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration was studied with a variance−covariance model, with experiment as a fixed effect. The experiments included in the analysis had a within-experiment variation of protozoa concentration higher than 5.3 log10 cells/ml corresponding to the average s.e.m. of the database for this variable. To detect potential interfering factors for the relationship, the influence of several qualitative and quantitative secondary factors was tested. This meta-analysis showed a significant linear relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration: methane (g/kg dry matter intake)=−30.7+8.14×protozoa (log10 cells/ml) with 28 experiments (91 treatments), residual mean square error=1.94 and adjusted R2=0.90. The proportion of butyrate in the rumen positively influenced the least square means of this relationship.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114001852methaneprotozoameta-analysisruminantvolatile fatty acids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Guyader
M. Eugène
P. Nozière
D.P. Morgavi
M. Doreau
C. Martin
spellingShingle J. Guyader
M. Eugène
P. Nozière
D.P. Morgavi
M. Doreau
C. Martin
Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
Animal
methane
protozoa
meta-analysis
ruminant
volatile fatty acids
author_facet J. Guyader
M. Eugène
P. Nozière
D.P. Morgavi
M. Doreau
C. Martin
author_sort J. Guyader
title Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
title_short Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
title_full Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
title_fullStr Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
title_full_unstemmed Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
title_sort influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach
publisher Elsevier
series Animal
issn 1751-7311
publishDate 2014-01-01
description A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of protozoa concentration on methane emission from ruminants. A database was built from 59 publications reporting data from 76 in vivo experiments. The experiments included in the database recorded methane production and rumen protozoa concentration measured on the same groups of animals. Quantitative data such as diet chemical composition, rumen fermentation and microbial parameters, and qualitative information such as methane mitigation strategies were also collected. In the database, 31% of the experiments reported a concomitant reduction of both protozoa concentration and methane emission (g/kg dry matter intake). Nearly all of these experiments tested lipids as methane mitigation strategies. By contrast, 21% of the experiments reported a variation in methane emission without changes in protozoa numbers, indicating that methanogenesis is also regulated by other mechanisms not involving protozoa. Experiments that used chemical compounds as an antimethanogenic treatment belonged to this group. The relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration was studied with a variance−covariance model, with experiment as a fixed effect. The experiments included in the analysis had a within-experiment variation of protozoa concentration higher than 5.3 log10 cells/ml corresponding to the average s.e.m. of the database for this variable. To detect potential interfering factors for the relationship, the influence of several qualitative and quantitative secondary factors was tested. This meta-analysis showed a significant linear relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration: methane (g/kg dry matter intake)=−30.7+8.14×protozoa (log10 cells/ml) with 28 experiments (91 treatments), residual mean square error=1.94 and adjusted R2=0.90. The proportion of butyrate in the rumen positively influenced the least square means of this relationship.
topic methane
protozoa
meta-analysis
ruminant
volatile fatty acids
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114001852
work_keys_str_mv AT jguyader influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
AT meugene influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
AT pnoziere influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
AT dpmorgavi influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
AT mdoreau influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
AT cmartin influenceofrumenprotozoaonmethaneemissioninruminantsametaanalysisapproach
_version_ 1721395215879634944