Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
ABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
|
Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-a4f249ab626a4fe199ac076313dbd41d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a4f249ab626a4fe199ac076313dbd41d2020-11-24T20:48:52ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-611945226227210.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0308S1677-55382019000200262Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approachesFrancesco Alessandro MistrettaAntonio GalfanoEttore Di TrapaniDario Di TrapaniAndrea RussoSilvia SeccoMatteo FerroGennaro MusiAldo Massimo BocciardiOttavio de CobelliABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results were primary outcomes evaluated in the study. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 9 KTRs who underwent transperitoneal RARP or Retzius-sparing RARP for PCa from October 2012 to April 2016. Data were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significant differences were accepted when p ≤ 0.05. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Four KTRs underwent a T-RARP and 5 a RS-RARP. Patient median age was 60 (56-63) years. Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (5-6). Preoperative median PSA was 5.6 (5-15) ng / mL. Preoperative Gleason score (GS) was 6 in 5 patients, 7 (3 + 4) in 3, and 8 (4 + 4) in one. Pre- and postoperative creatinine were 1.17 (1.1; 1.4) and 1.3 (1.07; 1.57) mg / dL (p = 0.237), while eGFR was 66 (60-82) and 62 (54-81) mL / min / 1.73m2 (p = 0.553), respectively. One (11.1%) Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred. Two extended template lymphadenectomies were performed, both with nodal invasion. These two patients experienced a biochemical recurrence and were subjected to RT. Two patients (22.2%) had PSMs. Median follow-up was 42 months. Seven patients (77.8%) were continent, 5 (55.6%) were potent. Two (22.2%) patients died during follow-up for oncologic unrelated causes. Conclusions: Our series suggests that both RARP approaches are safe and feasible techniques in KTRs for PCa.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262&lng=en&tlng=enKidney TransplantationProstatic NeoplasmsProstatectomyRobotics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta Antonio Galfano Ettore Di Trapani Dario Di Trapani Andrea Russo Silvia Secco Matteo Ferro Gennaro Musi Aldo Massimo Bocciardi Ottavio de Cobelli |
spellingShingle |
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta Antonio Galfano Ettore Di Trapani Dario Di Trapani Andrea Russo Silvia Secco Matteo Ferro Gennaro Musi Aldo Massimo Bocciardi Ottavio de Cobelli Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches International Brazilian Journal of Urology Kidney Transplantation Prostatic Neoplasms Prostatectomy Robotics |
author_facet |
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta Antonio Galfano Ettore Di Trapani Dario Di Trapani Andrea Russo Silvia Secco Matteo Ferro Gennaro Musi Aldo Massimo Bocciardi Ottavio de Cobelli |
author_sort |
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta |
title |
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
title_short |
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
title_full |
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
title_fullStr |
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
title_sort |
robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
series |
International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
issn |
1677-6119 |
description |
ABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results were primary outcomes evaluated in the study. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 9 KTRs who underwent transperitoneal RARP or Retzius-sparing RARP for PCa from October 2012 to April 2016. Data were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significant differences were accepted when p ≤ 0.05. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Four KTRs underwent a T-RARP and 5 a RS-RARP. Patient median age was 60 (56-63) years. Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (5-6). Preoperative median PSA was 5.6 (5-15) ng / mL. Preoperative Gleason score (GS) was 6 in 5 patients, 7 (3 + 4) in 3, and 8 (4 + 4) in one. Pre- and postoperative creatinine were 1.17 (1.1; 1.4) and 1.3 (1.07; 1.57) mg / dL (p = 0.237), while eGFR was 66 (60-82) and 62 (54-81) mL / min / 1.73m2 (p = 0.553), respectively. One (11.1%) Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred. Two extended template lymphadenectomies were performed, both with nodal invasion. These two patients experienced a biochemical recurrence and were subjected to RT. Two patients (22.2%) had PSMs. Median follow-up was 42 months. Seven patients (77.8%) were continent, 5 (55.6%) were potent. Two (22.2%) patients died during follow-up for oncologic unrelated causes. Conclusions: Our series suggests that both RARP approaches are safe and feasible techniques in KTRs for PCa. |
topic |
Kidney Transplantation Prostatic Neoplasms Prostatectomy Robotics |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francescoalessandromistretta robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT antoniogalfano robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT ettoreditrapani robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT darioditrapani robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT andrearusso robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT silviasecco robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT matteoferro robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT gennaromusi robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT aldomassimobocciardi robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches AT ottaviodecobelli robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches |
_version_ |
1716807642208272384 |