Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds

This paper brings data of verb compounds (V-Vs) from Japanese and Chinese, in an effort to uncover two issues: (a) whether the lexicalisation constraint (i.e. manner/result complementarity) applies to the languages that contain compound verbs; (b) how complex it can be to build compound verb. The fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wenchao LI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) 2014-12-01
Series:Acta Linguistica Asiatica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/2750
id doaj-a500803ef87a4f048a1ee91501e1541b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a500803ef87a4f048a1ee91501e1541b2020-11-25T00:31:09ZengZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Acta Linguistica Asiatica2232-33172014-12-01418910010.4312/ala.4.1.89-1002573Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compoundsWenchao LIThis paper brings data of verb compounds (V-Vs) from Japanese and Chinese, in an effort to uncover two issues: (a) whether the lexicalisation constraint (i.e. manner/result complementarity) applies to the languages that contain compound verbs; (b) how complex it can be to build compound verb. The finding reveals that manner and result are well encoded in most Japanese verb compounds, which gives rise to the assumption that the complementary constraint is not applicable to Japanese. In Chinese, the application of manner/result complementarity varies according to the types of V-V. In pair relation V-V, only manner meaning is conveyed. In predicate-complement V-V, both manner and result are lexicalised, with V1 encoding the manner and V2 denoting the result. Modifier-predicate V-V appears to only convey the manner. The conclusion emerging from the differing applications in the languages is that the manner/result complementary constraint does not apply to the languages that extensively employ verb compounds.http://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/2750lexicalisationmanner/result complementarityverb compoundJapaneseChinese
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wenchao LI
spellingShingle Wenchao LI
Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
Acta Linguistica Asiatica
lexicalisation
manner/result complementarity
verb compound
Japanese
Chinese
author_facet Wenchao LI
author_sort Wenchao LI
title Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
title_short Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
title_full Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
title_fullStr Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting Manner/Result Complementarity: with evidence from Japanese and Chinese verb compounds
title_sort revisiting manner/result complementarity: with evidence from japanese and chinese verb compounds
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
series Acta Linguistica Asiatica
issn 2232-3317
publishDate 2014-12-01
description This paper brings data of verb compounds (V-Vs) from Japanese and Chinese, in an effort to uncover two issues: (a) whether the lexicalisation constraint (i.e. manner/result complementarity) applies to the languages that contain compound verbs; (b) how complex it can be to build compound verb. The finding reveals that manner and result are well encoded in most Japanese verb compounds, which gives rise to the assumption that the complementary constraint is not applicable to Japanese. In Chinese, the application of manner/result complementarity varies according to the types of V-V. In pair relation V-V, only manner meaning is conveyed. In predicate-complement V-V, both manner and result are lexicalised, with V1 encoding the manner and V2 denoting the result. Modifier-predicate V-V appears to only convey the manner. The conclusion emerging from the differing applications in the languages is that the manner/result complementary constraint does not apply to the languages that extensively employ verb compounds.
topic lexicalisation
manner/result complementarity
verb compound
Japanese
Chinese
url http://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/2750
work_keys_str_mv AT wenchaoli revisitingmannerresultcomplementaritywithevidencefromjapaneseandchineseverbcompounds
_version_ 1725323505951571968