Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics

Patterns of human land use (LU) necessarily transform the land systems that sustain and contain them. Importantly, the impacts of such transformations are not isolated in space and time. LU management decisions that are made at a given geographic unit regularly impact both human and nonhuman well-be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Russell C. Weaver, Jason Knight
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-06-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/3/2/504
id doaj-a502922ac64043ecbff4f7c7c8e8990a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a502922ac64043ecbff4f7c7c8e8990a2020-11-24T22:20:44ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2014-06-013250452310.3390/land3020504land3020504Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and PoliticsRussell C. Weaver0Jason Knight1MS GIS Program, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Redlands, 1200 E, Colton Ave., P.O. Box 3080, Redlands, CA 92374, USADepartment of Geography and Planning, SUNY Buffalo State College, 1300 Elmwood Ave., Buffalo, NY 14222, USAPatterns of human land use (LU) necessarily transform the land systems that sustain and contain them. Importantly, the impacts of such transformations are not isolated in space and time. LU management decisions that are made at a given geographic unit regularly impact both human and nonhuman well-being beyond the spatiotemporal boundaries of that unit. To superintend the conflicts that arise out of such circumstances, human LUs are generally subject to institutional regulations. As patterns of socio-ecological interactions change over time, these LU institutions require reform or replacement, as extant rules or LUs can become maladapted to new environmental conditions. The current paper defines this situation—in which a LU that was established in a given environment becomes dysfunctional when relevant environmental factors are changed—as a LU mismatch. It then develops a framework for studying the policy and politics of LU mismatches through the lens of evolutionary (mismatch) theory. The framework provides a means for understanding the origins and nature of LU mismatches, and, in turn, it implicates leverage points for public policy intervention. We conclude by exploring how the framework offers a relatively nonpartisan discursive frame for stakeholders to employ in LU mismatch planning and political arenas.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/3/2/504land useland use mismatchevolutionary mismatchland use policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Russell C. Weaver
Jason Knight
spellingShingle Russell C. Weaver
Jason Knight
Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
Land
land use
land use mismatch
evolutionary mismatch
land use policy
author_facet Russell C. Weaver
Jason Knight
author_sort Russell C. Weaver
title Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
title_short Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
title_full Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
title_fullStr Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics
title_sort evolutionary mismatch as a general framework for land use policy and politics
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Patterns of human land use (LU) necessarily transform the land systems that sustain and contain them. Importantly, the impacts of such transformations are not isolated in space and time. LU management decisions that are made at a given geographic unit regularly impact both human and nonhuman well-being beyond the spatiotemporal boundaries of that unit. To superintend the conflicts that arise out of such circumstances, human LUs are generally subject to institutional regulations. As patterns of socio-ecological interactions change over time, these LU institutions require reform or replacement, as extant rules or LUs can become maladapted to new environmental conditions. The current paper defines this situation—in which a LU that was established in a given environment becomes dysfunctional when relevant environmental factors are changed—as a LU mismatch. It then develops a framework for studying the policy and politics of LU mismatches through the lens of evolutionary (mismatch) theory. The framework provides a means for understanding the origins and nature of LU mismatches, and, in turn, it implicates leverage points for public policy intervention. We conclude by exploring how the framework offers a relatively nonpartisan discursive frame for stakeholders to employ in LU mismatch planning and political arenas.
topic land use
land use mismatch
evolutionary mismatch
land use policy
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/3/2/504
work_keys_str_mv AT russellcweaver evolutionarymismatchasageneralframeworkforlandusepolicyandpolitics
AT jasonknight evolutionarymismatchasageneralframeworkforlandusepolicyandpolitics
_version_ 1725774246738657280