Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages

Structural monitoring of objects is primarily executed to assess external and internal effects on the object, in order to ensure the safety of people, animals, and material assets. Such monitoring can be executed through various methods, depending on the object, conditions for execution, and purpose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kovačič Boštjan, Muršec Luka, Toplak Sebastian, Lubej Samo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_03001.pdf
id doaj-a50ff1567294478ab885e79449d4cab7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a50ff1567294478ab885e79449d4cab72021-02-02T08:48:29ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011640300110.1051/e3sconf/202016403001e3sconf_tpacee2020_03001Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damagesKovačič Boštjan0Muršec Luka1Toplak Sebastian2Lubej Samo3University of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and ArchitectureStructural monitoring of objects is primarily executed to assess external and internal effects on the object, in order to ensure the safety of people, animals, and material assets. Such monitoring can be executed through various methods, depending on the object, conditions for execution, and purpose of the monitoring. In this case, the focus is on the execution of the monitoring of Maribor footbridge, where the dynamic effects of the object are monitored. For this purpose, geophone, accelerometer, and geodetic methods—using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Robotic Total Station (RTS) equipment—are used, of which one is controlled by the additional programme GeoComZG. The emphasis of our experiment is on the application of non-contact geodetic methods, with which the measurements of dynamic response are typically performed, as they enable measurements up to 30 and 100 Hz with RTS and GNSS, respectively. In this article, the application of various procedures of non-contact data capture on the footbridge are detailed and a comparison and analysis of the obtained values for monitoring the dynamic response of the structure are presented.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_03001.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kovačič Boštjan
Muršec Luka
Toplak Sebastian
Lubej Samo
spellingShingle Kovačič Boštjan
Muršec Luka
Toplak Sebastian
Lubej Samo
Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Kovačič Boštjan
Muršec Luka
Toplak Sebastian
Lubej Samo
author_sort Kovačič Boštjan
title Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
title_short Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
title_full Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
title_fullStr Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
title_full_unstemmed Non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
title_sort non-contact monitoring for assessing potential bridge damages
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Structural monitoring of objects is primarily executed to assess external and internal effects on the object, in order to ensure the safety of people, animals, and material assets. Such monitoring can be executed through various methods, depending on the object, conditions for execution, and purpose of the monitoring. In this case, the focus is on the execution of the monitoring of Maribor footbridge, where the dynamic effects of the object are monitored. For this purpose, geophone, accelerometer, and geodetic methods—using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Robotic Total Station (RTS) equipment—are used, of which one is controlled by the additional programme GeoComZG. The emphasis of our experiment is on the application of non-contact geodetic methods, with which the measurements of dynamic response are typically performed, as they enable measurements up to 30 and 100 Hz with RTS and GNSS, respectively. In this article, the application of various procedures of non-contact data capture on the footbridge are detailed and a comparison and analysis of the obtained values for monitoring the dynamic response of the structure are presented.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_03001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacicbostjan noncontactmonitoringforassessingpotentialbridgedamages
AT mursecluka noncontactmonitoringforassessingpotentialbridgedamages
AT toplaksebastian noncontactmonitoringforassessingpotentialbridgedamages
AT lubejsamo noncontactmonitoringforassessingpotentialbridgedamages
_version_ 1724296369190993920