Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe

After the dissolution of the Habsburg Empire, leaders in successor states were eager to become economically independent from the former capital Vienna. They therefore quickly implemented a set of neomercantilistic measures, especially nationalization programs. Nevertheless, the 1920s saw a reestabli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Weigl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-11-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/11/129
id doaj-a537de7dc4ba473195d36e2931adc74c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a537de7dc4ba473195d36e2931adc74c2020-11-24T23:30:59ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-11-0171112910.3390/rel7110129rel7110129Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar EuropeAndreas Weigl0Department of Economic and Social History, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, AustriaAfter the dissolution of the Habsburg Empire, leaders in successor states were eager to become economically independent from the former capital Vienna. They therefore quickly implemented a set of neomercantilistic measures, especially nationalization programs. Nevertheless, the 1920s saw a reestablishment of the common market in the former territories of the Habsburg Empire in terms of interregional trade and interlocking directorates, mainly because of the business strategy of international financial syndicates that were based on the traditional Viennese commercial relations with the successor states. The international credit of Jewish bankers like Louis Rothschild, Rudolf Sieghart, and Max Feilchenfeld and others mattered. After the “Big Bang” at Wall Street in 1929, the industrial holdings of the Viennese banks and the maturity problem (short-term borrowing, long-term lending) in their relations to East European debtors and Western financiers caused the Creditanstalt-crisis of 1931 and put an end to Vienna’s position as a financial hub in East Central Europe. However, even during the crisis of the 1930s, the share of the successor states in the bilateral balances of trade indicates path dependency on a smaller scale.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/11/129Habsburg Monarchysuccessor statesViennaJewsbusiness relationsinterregional tradeinterlocking directoratespath dependency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Weigl
spellingShingle Andreas Weigl
Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
Religions
Habsburg Monarchy
successor states
Vienna
Jews
business relations
interregional trade
interlocking directorates
path dependency
author_facet Andreas Weigl
author_sort Andreas Weigl
title Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
title_short Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
title_full Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
title_fullStr Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
title_full_unstemmed Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe
title_sort beggar-thy-neighbour vs. danube basin strategy: habsburg economic networks in interwar europe
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2016-11-01
description After the dissolution of the Habsburg Empire, leaders in successor states were eager to become economically independent from the former capital Vienna. They therefore quickly implemented a set of neomercantilistic measures, especially nationalization programs. Nevertheless, the 1920s saw a reestablishment of the common market in the former territories of the Habsburg Empire in terms of interregional trade and interlocking directorates, mainly because of the business strategy of international financial syndicates that were based on the traditional Viennese commercial relations with the successor states. The international credit of Jewish bankers like Louis Rothschild, Rudolf Sieghart, and Max Feilchenfeld and others mattered. After the “Big Bang” at Wall Street in 1929, the industrial holdings of the Viennese banks and the maturity problem (short-term borrowing, long-term lending) in their relations to East European debtors and Western financiers caused the Creditanstalt-crisis of 1931 and put an end to Vienna’s position as a financial hub in East Central Europe. However, even during the crisis of the 1930s, the share of the successor states in the bilateral balances of trade indicates path dependency on a smaller scale.
topic Habsburg Monarchy
successor states
Vienna
Jews
business relations
interregional trade
interlocking directorates
path dependency
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/11/129
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasweigl beggarthyneighbourvsdanubebasinstrategyhabsburgeconomicnetworksininterwareurope
_version_ 1725539304247132160