The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)

Abstract Background To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), strati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Nickels, Alexander K. Schuster, Susanne Singer, Philipp S. Wild, Dagmar Laubert-Reh, Andreas Schulz, Robert P. Finger, Matthias Michal, Manfred E. Beutel, Thomas Münzel, Karl J. Lackner, Norbert Pfeiffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7
id doaj-a53a0ba704ef460a94991a0dd869453c
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Nickels
Alexander K. Schuster
Susanne Singer
Philipp S. Wild
Dagmar Laubert-Reh
Andreas Schulz
Robert P. Finger
Matthias Michal
Manfred E. Beutel
Thomas Münzel
Karl J. Lackner
Norbert Pfeiffer
spellingShingle Stefan Nickels
Alexander K. Schuster
Susanne Singer
Philipp S. Wild
Dagmar Laubert-Reh
Andreas Schulz
Robert P. Finger
Matthias Michal
Manfred E. Beutel
Thomas Münzel
Karl J. Lackner
Norbert Pfeiffer
The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Stefan Nickels
Alexander K. Schuster
Susanne Singer
Philipp S. Wild
Dagmar Laubert-Reh
Andreas Schulz
Robert P. Finger
Matthias Michal
Manfred E. Beutel
Thomas Münzel
Karl J. Lackner
Norbert Pfeiffer
author_sort Stefan Nickels
title The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_short The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_full The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_fullStr The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_full_unstemmed The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_sort national eye institute 25-item visual function questionnaire (nei vfq-25) – reference data from the german population-based gutenberg health study (ghs)
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Background To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), stratified by sex and age. Methods The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based, prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, including 15,010 participants aged between 35 and 74. The baseline examination was conducted between 2007 and 2012. To overcome known shortcomings of the NEI VFQ-25, we calculated the previously proposed visual functioning scale and the socio-emotional scale based on Rasch-transformed person-level data. We present mean values, standard deviations and percentiles for age decades stratified by sex. We used a linear regression model to assess the influence of age, sex, socioeconomic status, distance-corrected visual acuity (better-seeing eye) and the absolute difference in distance-corrected visual acuity of both eyes on vision-related QoL. Results NEI VFQ-25 data are available from 12,231 participants (82%). Both the long-form visual functioning scale (LFVFS) and the long-form socio-emotional scale (LFSES) showed a clear age dependency, with an average LFVFS score of 92.8 for men and 90.5 for women in the youngest age group and 85.7 and 83.4 in the oldest age group, and a LFSES score of 98.3 for men and 98.1 in women in the youngest and 94.7 and 94.5 in the oldest decade. The largest difference was observed between the youngest age group (35–44 years) and the 45–54 years group. Men tended to have slightly higher scores than women. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, age (per 5 years −0.42), female sex (−1.57), worse distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −2.92) and the difference between both eyes (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −0.87) were associated with a reduced LFVFS score (all p < 0.001). For the LFSES score, we showed that the influence of sex was minor, and that age (per 5 years −0.22), visual acuity of the better eye (−1.65), and the difference between both eyes (−0.56) were associated with a lower score (all p < 0.001). Conclusions We report age- and sex-specific reference data from a large population-based study of mainly Caucasian ethnicity of two unidimensional scores based on Rasch-transformed NEI VFQ-25 data. Vision-related QoL is lower in older and in female individuals. Our results support the association of vision-related QoL not only with the distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye but also with the difference in visual acuity between each eye. Our findings could be used as a reference for comparison in future studies addressing the influence of eye diseases on vision-related QoL.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7
work_keys_str_mv AT stefannickels thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT alexanderkschuster thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT susannesinger thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT philippswild thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT dagmarlaubertreh thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT andreasschulz thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT robertpfinger thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT matthiasmichal thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT manfredebeutel thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT thomasmunzel thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT karljlackner thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT norbertpfeiffer thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT stefannickels nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT alexanderkschuster nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT susannesinger nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT philippswild nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT dagmarlaubertreh nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT andreasschulz nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT robertpfinger nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT matthiasmichal nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT manfredebeutel nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT thomasmunzel nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT karljlackner nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT norbertpfeiffer nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
_version_ 1725364589249429504
spelling doaj-a53a0ba704ef460a94991a0dd869453c2020-11-25T00:20:59ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252017-08-0115111010.1186/s12955-017-0732-7The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)Stefan Nickels0Alexander K. Schuster1Susanne Singer2Philipp S. Wild3Dagmar Laubert-Reh4Andreas Schulz5Robert P. Finger6Matthias Michal7Manfred E. Beutel8Thomas Münzel9Karl J. Lackner10Norbert Pfeiffer11Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzInstitute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center MainzPreventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center MainzPreventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center MainzPreventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of BonnDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center MainzCenter for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center MainzInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzAbstract Background To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), stratified by sex and age. Methods The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based, prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, including 15,010 participants aged between 35 and 74. The baseline examination was conducted between 2007 and 2012. To overcome known shortcomings of the NEI VFQ-25, we calculated the previously proposed visual functioning scale and the socio-emotional scale based on Rasch-transformed person-level data. We present mean values, standard deviations and percentiles for age decades stratified by sex. We used a linear regression model to assess the influence of age, sex, socioeconomic status, distance-corrected visual acuity (better-seeing eye) and the absolute difference in distance-corrected visual acuity of both eyes on vision-related QoL. Results NEI VFQ-25 data are available from 12,231 participants (82%). Both the long-form visual functioning scale (LFVFS) and the long-form socio-emotional scale (LFSES) showed a clear age dependency, with an average LFVFS score of 92.8 for men and 90.5 for women in the youngest age group and 85.7 and 83.4 in the oldest age group, and a LFSES score of 98.3 for men and 98.1 in women in the youngest and 94.7 and 94.5 in the oldest decade. The largest difference was observed between the youngest age group (35–44 years) and the 45–54 years group. Men tended to have slightly higher scores than women. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, age (per 5 years −0.42), female sex (−1.57), worse distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −2.92) and the difference between both eyes (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −0.87) were associated with a reduced LFVFS score (all p < 0.001). For the LFSES score, we showed that the influence of sex was minor, and that age (per 5 years −0.22), visual acuity of the better eye (−1.65), and the difference between both eyes (−0.56) were associated with a lower score (all p < 0.001). Conclusions We report age- and sex-specific reference data from a large population-based study of mainly Caucasian ethnicity of two unidimensional scores based on Rasch-transformed NEI VFQ-25 data. Vision-related QoL is lower in older and in female individuals. Our results support the association of vision-related QoL not only with the distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye but also with the difference in visual acuity between each eye. Our findings could be used as a reference for comparison in future studies addressing the influence of eye diseases on vision-related QoL.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7