New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns

<p>Low-level flights over tundra wetlands in Alaska and Canada have been conducted during the Airborne Measurements of Methane Emissions (AirMeth) campaigns to measure turbulent methane fluxes in the atmosphere. In this paper we describe the instrumentation and new calibration procedures fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Hartmann, M. Gehrmann, K. Kohnert, S. Metzger, T. Sachs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4567/2018/amt-11-4567-2018.pdf
id doaj-a53db22a3b6b49cf9127aadef762bfc7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a53db22a3b6b49cf9127aadef762bfc72020-11-24T22:25:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482018-07-01114567458110.5194/amt-11-4567-2018New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaignsJ. Hartmann0M. Gehrmann1K. Kohnert2S. Metzger3S. Metzger4T. Sachs5Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, GermanyGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyNational Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle, 1685 38th Street, Boulder, CO 80301, USAUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI 53706, USAGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany<p>Low-level flights over tundra wetlands in Alaska and Canada have been conducted during the Airborne Measurements of Methane Emissions (AirMeth) campaigns to measure turbulent methane fluxes in the atmosphere. In this paper we describe the instrumentation and new calibration procedures for the essential pressure parameters required for turbulence sensing by aircraft that exploit suitable regular measurement flight legs without the need for dedicated calibration patterns. We estimate the accuracy of the mean wind and the turbulence measurements. We show that airborne measurements of turbulent fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide using cavity ring-down spectroscopy trace gas analysers together with established turbulence equipment achieve a relative accuracy similar to that of measurements of sensible heat flux if applied during low-level flights over natural area sources. The inertial subrange of the trace gas fluctuations cannot be resolved due to insufficient high-frequency precision of the analyser, but, since this scatter is uncorrelated with the vertical wind velocity, the covariance and thus the flux are reproduced correctly. In the covariance spectra the −7∕3 drop-off in the inertial subrange can be reproduced if sufficient data are available for averaging. For convective conditions and flight legs of several tens of kilometres we estimate the flux detection limit to be about 4&thinsp;mg&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for <span style="text-decoration: overline;"><i>w</i>′CH<sub>4</sub>′</span>, 1.4&thinsp;g&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for <span style="text-decoration: overline;"><i>w</i>′CO<sub>2</sub>′</span> and 4.2&thinsp;W&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup> for the sensible heat flux.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4567/2018/amt-11-4567-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Hartmann
M. Gehrmann
K. Kohnert
S. Metzger
S. Metzger
T. Sachs
spellingShingle J. Hartmann
M. Gehrmann
K. Kohnert
S. Metzger
S. Metzger
T. Sachs
New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet J. Hartmann
M. Gehrmann
K. Kohnert
S. Metzger
S. Metzger
T. Sachs
author_sort J. Hartmann
title New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
title_short New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
title_full New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
title_fullStr New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
title_full_unstemmed New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
title_sort new calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the airmeth campaigns
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2018-07-01
description <p>Low-level flights over tundra wetlands in Alaska and Canada have been conducted during the Airborne Measurements of Methane Emissions (AirMeth) campaigns to measure turbulent methane fluxes in the atmosphere. In this paper we describe the instrumentation and new calibration procedures for the essential pressure parameters required for turbulence sensing by aircraft that exploit suitable regular measurement flight legs without the need for dedicated calibration patterns. We estimate the accuracy of the mean wind and the turbulence measurements. We show that airborne measurements of turbulent fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide using cavity ring-down spectroscopy trace gas analysers together with established turbulence equipment achieve a relative accuracy similar to that of measurements of sensible heat flux if applied during low-level flights over natural area sources. The inertial subrange of the trace gas fluctuations cannot be resolved due to insufficient high-frequency precision of the analyser, but, since this scatter is uncorrelated with the vertical wind velocity, the covariance and thus the flux are reproduced correctly. In the covariance spectra the −7∕3 drop-off in the inertial subrange can be reproduced if sufficient data are available for averaging. For convective conditions and flight legs of several tens of kilometres we estimate the flux detection limit to be about 4&thinsp;mg&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for <span style="text-decoration: overline;"><i>w</i>′CH<sub>4</sub>′</span>, 1.4&thinsp;g&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for <span style="text-decoration: overline;"><i>w</i>′CO<sub>2</sub>′</span> and 4.2&thinsp;W&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup> for the sensible heat flux.</p>
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4567/2018/amt-11-4567-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jhartmann newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
AT mgehrmann newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
AT kkohnert newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
AT smetzger newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
AT smetzger newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
AT tsachs newcalibrationproceduresforairborneturbulencemeasurementsandaccuracyofthemethanefluxesduringtheairmethcampaigns
_version_ 1725756408737038336