Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial

Background: Both subcuticular suturing and stapler closure are used for skin closure. However, the superiority of one over the other is yet to be established clearly. Aims: This study compares the efficacy of skin closure technique by stapler and subcuticular suture in patients undergoing Lichtenste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sathasivam Sureshkumar, Datta Souraja, Elangovan Archana, Sahla Sathar, Thulasingam Mahalakshmy, Chinnakali Palanivel, Vikram Kate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2020;volume=7;issue=1;spage=27;epage=31;aulast=Sureshkumar
id doaj-a53f3bc4ab944ce5b50576cf01cbb0b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a53f3bc4ab944ce5b50576cf01cbb0b32020-11-25T03:23:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research2349-42202350-02982020-01-0171273110.4103/IJAMR.IJAMR_27_20Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trialSathasivam SureshkumarDatta SourajaElangovan ArchanaSahla SatharThulasingam MahalakshmyChinnakali PalanivelVikram KateBackground: Both subcuticular suturing and stapler closure are used for skin closure. However, the superiority of one over the other is yet to be established clearly. Aims: This study compares the efficacy of skin closure technique by stapler and subcuticular suture in patients undergoing Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: Elective inguinal hernia repair patients were randomized to undergo skin closure using either subcuticular sutures or staplers. Skin closure time in minutes, postoperative wound site pain using the Visual Analog Scale, wound cosmesis and scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction using the Likert scale were assessed. Results: A total of 38 patients with inguinal hernia were included: 20 in subcuticular suture group and 18 in stapler group. The scar outcomes assessed by patients (3.05 ± 1.83 vs. 4.94 ± 2.54; P = 0.0013) and observers (2.83 ± 0.98 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67; P = 0.0105) were significantly better in the subcuticular group. The time taken for skin closure was significantly longer in the suture group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative wound pain (P = 0.65), patient satisfaction (P = 0.238), and outcome of wound healing (P = 0.900). Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome of skin closure with subcuticular suture was better. Time taken for skin closure using staplers was shorter compared to suturing. Postoperative wound pain, patient satisfaction, and wound healing were similar between the two groups.http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2020;volume=7;issue=1;spage=27;epage=31;aulast=Sureshkumarpatient satisfactionpostoperative wound painskin closurevisual analog scalewound cosmesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sathasivam Sureshkumar
Datta Souraja
Elangovan Archana
Sahla Sathar
Thulasingam Mahalakshmy
Chinnakali Palanivel
Vikram Kate
spellingShingle Sathasivam Sureshkumar
Datta Souraja
Elangovan Archana
Sahla Sathar
Thulasingam Mahalakshmy
Chinnakali Palanivel
Vikram Kate
Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
patient satisfaction
postoperative wound pain
skin closure
visual analog scale
wound cosmesis
author_facet Sathasivam Sureshkumar
Datta Souraja
Elangovan Archana
Sahla Sathar
Thulasingam Mahalakshmy
Chinnakali Palanivel
Vikram Kate
author_sort Sathasivam Sureshkumar
title Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – an open-label randomized controlled trial
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
issn 2349-4220
2350-0298
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Both subcuticular suturing and stapler closure are used for skin closure. However, the superiority of one over the other is yet to be established clearly. Aims: This study compares the efficacy of skin closure technique by stapler and subcuticular suture in patients undergoing Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: Elective inguinal hernia repair patients were randomized to undergo skin closure using either subcuticular sutures or staplers. Skin closure time in minutes, postoperative wound site pain using the Visual Analog Scale, wound cosmesis and scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction using the Likert scale were assessed. Results: A total of 38 patients with inguinal hernia were included: 20 in subcuticular suture group and 18 in stapler group. The scar outcomes assessed by patients (3.05 ± 1.83 vs. 4.94 ± 2.54; P = 0.0013) and observers (2.83 ± 0.98 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67; P = 0.0105) were significantly better in the subcuticular group. The time taken for skin closure was significantly longer in the suture group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative wound pain (P = 0.65), patient satisfaction (P = 0.238), and outcome of wound healing (P = 0.900). Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome of skin closure with subcuticular suture was better. Time taken for skin closure using staplers was shorter compared to suturing. Postoperative wound pain, patient satisfaction, and wound healing were similar between the two groups.
topic patient satisfaction
postoperative wound pain
skin closure
visual analog scale
wound cosmesis
url http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2020;volume=7;issue=1;spage=27;epage=31;aulast=Sureshkumar
work_keys_str_mv AT sathasivamsureshkumar comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dattasouraja comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elangovanarchana comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sahlasathar comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thulasingammahalakshmy comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chinnakalipalanivel comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vikramkate comparisonofskinclosuretechniquewithstaplerandsubcuticularsutureinpatientswithinguinalherniaundergoinglichtensteintensionfreemeshrepairanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724606556441411584