Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality

Abstract Background As right colon polyps are challenging to detect, a retroflexed view of right colon (RV) may be useful. However, cecal retroflexion (CR) without a RV to the hepatic flexure (HF) is inadequate. We aimed to determine the frequency of CR and quality of the RV in routine practice. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh N. Keswani, Charles J. Kahi, Mark Benson, Andrew J. Gawron, Tonya R. Kaltenbach, Rena H. Yadlapati, Dyanna L. Gregory, Anna Duloy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01877-4
id doaj-a579825c5b6e44d59678677ead235660
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a579825c5b6e44d59678677ead2356602021-08-01T11:16:24ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2021-07-012111510.1186/s12876-021-01877-4Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor qualityRajesh N. Keswani0Charles J. Kahi1Mark Benson2Andrew J. Gawron3Tonya R. Kaltenbach4Rena H. Yadlapati5Dyanna L. Gregory6Anna Duloy7Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Indiana University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of WisconsinDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of UtahDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of CaliforniaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of ColoradoAbstract Background As right colon polyps are challenging to detect, a retroflexed view of right colon (RV) may be useful. However, cecal retroflexion (CR) without a RV to the hepatic flexure (HF) is inadequate. We aimed to determine the frequency of CR and quality of the RV in routine practice. Methods This prospective observational study performed at an academic medical center assessed colonoscopy inspection technique of endoscopists who had performed ≥ 100 annual screening colonoscopies. We video recorded ≥ 28 screening/surveillance colonoscopies per endoscopist and randomly evaluated 7 videos per endoscopist. Six gastroenterologists blindly reviewed the videos to determine if CR was performed and HF withdrawal time (cecum to HF time, excluding ileal/polypectomy time). Results Reviewers assessed 119 colonoscopies performed by 17 endoscopists. The median HF withdrawal time was 3 min and 46 s. CR was performed in 31% of colonoscopies. CR frequency varied between endoscopists with 9 never performing CR and 2 performing CR in all colonoscopies. When performed, nearly half (43%) of RVs did not extend to the HF with median RV duration of 16 s (IQR 9–30 s). Three polyps were identified in the RV (polyp detection rate of 8.1%), all identified prior to a forward view. Conclusions CR is performed infrequently in routine practice. When CR is performed, the RV is of low quality with a very short inspection duration and insufficient ascending colon examination. Further education is required to educate endoscopists in optimal technique to improve overall colonoscopy quality.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01877-4RetroflexionQualityRight colon
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajesh N. Keswani
Charles J. Kahi
Mark Benson
Andrew J. Gawron
Tonya R. Kaltenbach
Rena H. Yadlapati
Dyanna L. Gregory
Anna Duloy
spellingShingle Rajesh N. Keswani
Charles J. Kahi
Mark Benson
Andrew J. Gawron
Tonya R. Kaltenbach
Rena H. Yadlapati
Dyanna L. Gregory
Anna Duloy
Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
BMC Gastroenterology
Retroflexion
Quality
Right colon
author_facet Rajesh N. Keswani
Charles J. Kahi
Mark Benson
Andrew J. Gawron
Tonya R. Kaltenbach
Rena H. Yadlapati
Dyanna L. Gregory
Anna Duloy
author_sort Rajesh N. Keswani
title Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
title_short Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
title_full Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
title_fullStr Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
title_full_unstemmed Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
title_sort cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background As right colon polyps are challenging to detect, a retroflexed view of right colon (RV) may be useful. However, cecal retroflexion (CR) without a RV to the hepatic flexure (HF) is inadequate. We aimed to determine the frequency of CR and quality of the RV in routine practice. Methods This prospective observational study performed at an academic medical center assessed colonoscopy inspection technique of endoscopists who had performed ≥ 100 annual screening colonoscopies. We video recorded ≥ 28 screening/surveillance colonoscopies per endoscopist and randomly evaluated 7 videos per endoscopist. Six gastroenterologists blindly reviewed the videos to determine if CR was performed and HF withdrawal time (cecum to HF time, excluding ileal/polypectomy time). Results Reviewers assessed 119 colonoscopies performed by 17 endoscopists. The median HF withdrawal time was 3 min and 46 s. CR was performed in 31% of colonoscopies. CR frequency varied between endoscopists with 9 never performing CR and 2 performing CR in all colonoscopies. When performed, nearly half (43%) of RVs did not extend to the HF with median RV duration of 16 s (IQR 9–30 s). Three polyps were identified in the RV (polyp detection rate of 8.1%), all identified prior to a forward view. Conclusions CR is performed infrequently in routine practice. When CR is performed, the RV is of low quality with a very short inspection duration and insufficient ascending colon examination. Further education is required to educate endoscopists in optimal technique to improve overall colonoscopy quality.
topic Retroflexion
Quality
Right colon
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01877-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshnkeswani cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT charlesjkahi cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT markbenson cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT andrewjgawron cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT tonyarkaltenbach cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT renahyadlapati cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT dyannalgregory cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
AT annaduloy cecalretroflexionisinfrequentlyperformedinroutinepracticeandtheretroflexedviewisofpoorquality
_version_ 1721246129994072064