Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory con...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Fungi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24 |
id |
doaj-a57b13be82ab4ae0af41dd4599001d0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a57b13be82ab4ae0af41dd4599001d0c2021-01-05T00:03:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2021-01-017242410.3390/jof7010024Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature ReviewAna Espinel-Ingroff0Emilia Cantón1Javier Pemán2VCU Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USASevere Infection Research Group, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainSevere Infection Research Group, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainFungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility—EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent <i>Candida</i><i> </i>and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for <i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>C. glabrata</i>, and <i>C. </i><i>krusei</i>. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging <i>Candida </i>spp., including <i>C. </i><i>auris</i>, as well as two <i>Cryptococcus</i> spp., two <i>Trichosporon</i> spp., <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and five <i>Malassezia</i> spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common <i>Candida </i>species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other <i>Candida </i>species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24non-prevalent <i>Candida</i>antifungal resistancenew and established antifungal agents<i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i>other yeast pathogens |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ana Espinel-Ingroff Emilia Cantón Javier Pemán |
spellingShingle |
Ana Espinel-Ingroff Emilia Cantón Javier Pemán Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review Journal of Fungi non-prevalent <i>Candida</i> antifungal resistance new and established antifungal agents <i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i> other yeast pathogens |
author_facet |
Ana Espinel-Ingroff Emilia Cantón Javier Pemán |
author_sort |
Ana Espinel-Ingroff |
title |
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review |
title_short |
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review |
title_full |
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review |
title_sort |
antifungal resistance among less prevalent <i>candida</i> non-<i>albicans</i> and other yeasts versus established and under development agents: a literature review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Fungi |
issn |
2309-608X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility—EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent <i>Candida</i><i> </i>and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for <i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>C. glabrata</i>, and <i>C. </i><i>krusei</i>. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging <i>Candida </i>spp., including <i>C. </i><i>auris</i>, as well as two <i>Cryptococcus</i> spp., two <i>Trichosporon</i> spp., <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and five <i>Malassezia</i> spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common <i>Candida </i>species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other <i>Candida </i>species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents. |
topic |
non-prevalent <i>Candida</i> antifungal resistance new and established antifungal agents <i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i> other yeast pathogens |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anaespinelingroff antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview AT emiliacanton antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview AT javierpeman antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1724348790888988672 |