Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review

Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Emilia Cantón, Javier Pemán
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Fungi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24
id doaj-a57b13be82ab4ae0af41dd4599001d0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a57b13be82ab4ae0af41dd4599001d0c2021-01-05T00:03:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2021-01-017242410.3390/jof7010024Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature ReviewAna Espinel-Ingroff0Emilia Cantón1Javier Pemán2VCU Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USASevere Infection Research Group, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainSevere Infection Research Group, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainFungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility—EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent <i>Candida</i><i> </i>and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for <i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>C. glabrata</i>, and <i>C. </i><i>krusei</i>. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging <i>Candida </i>spp., including <i>C. </i><i>auris</i>, as well as two <i>Cryptococcus</i> spp., two <i>Trichosporon</i> spp., <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and five <i>Malassezia</i> spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common <i>Candida </i>species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other <i>Candida </i>species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24non-prevalent <i>Candida</i>antifungal resistancenew and established antifungal agents<i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i>other yeast pathogens
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Emilia Cantón
Javier Pemán
spellingShingle Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Emilia Cantón
Javier Pemán
Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
Journal of Fungi
non-prevalent <i>Candida</i>
antifungal resistance
new and established antifungal agents
<i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i>
other yeast pathogens
author_facet Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Emilia Cantón
Javier Pemán
author_sort Ana Espinel-Ingroff
title Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
title_short Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
title_full Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent <i>Candida</i> Non-<i>albicans</i> and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review
title_sort antifungal resistance among less prevalent <i>candida</i> non-<i>albicans</i> and other yeasts versus established and under development agents: a literature review
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Fungi
issn 2309-608X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility—EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent <i>Candida</i><i> </i>and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for <i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>C. glabrata</i>, and <i>C. </i><i>krusei</i>. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging <i>Candida </i>spp., including <i>C. </i><i>auris</i>, as well as two <i>Cryptococcus</i> spp., two <i>Trichosporon</i> spp., <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and five <i>Malassezia</i> spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common <i>Candida </i>species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other <i>Candida </i>species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents.
topic non-prevalent <i>Candida</i>
antifungal resistance
new and established antifungal agents
<i>Candida</i>-non <i>albicans</i>
other yeast pathogens
url https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/1/24
work_keys_str_mv AT anaespinelingroff antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview
AT emiliacanton antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview
AT javierpeman antifungalresistanceamonglessprevalenticandidainonialbicansiandotheryeastsversusestablishedandunderdevelopmentagentsaliteraturereview
_version_ 1724348790888988672