Data eetention in CJEU Case Law

Possession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and timely access of authorized competent state bodies to such data is without a doubt a useful tool in the fight against modern forms of crime. For that reason, it is justified to establish an obligatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bugarski Tatjana D., Pisarić Milana M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2020-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2020/0550-21792004231B.pdf
id doaj-a5e54e47a73c4923a7c49b55a78efe46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5e54e47a73c4923a7c49b55a78efe462021-07-20T07:41:52ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552020-01-015441231125210.5937/zrpfns54-299640550-21792004231BData eetention in CJEU Case LawBugarski Tatjana D.0Pisarić Milana M.1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-3349Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet, SerbiaUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet, SerbiaPossession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and timely access of authorized competent state bodies to such data is without a doubt a useful tool in the fight against modern forms of crime. For that reason, it is justified to establish an obligation for providers of electronic communications services to keep certain data on communications for a certain period of time in the realization of which they mediate and to hand over that data at the request of authorized state bodies, in order to use them for legitimate purposes. For this reason, the Data Retention Directive was adopted in 2006, which Member States were required to transpose into national law. However, data retention poses a risk to basic human rights and freedoms, if the regulation establishing this obligation does so without respecting the essence of these rights and freedoms, especially the right to privacy and rights related to the processing of personal data, for which reason the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive invalid is 2014. Despite this decision, Member States continue to regulate the obligation to retain data in their national regulations. In this regard, the question of compliance of these regulations with the fundamental rights and freedoms and principles of the Union is raised. The subject of the paper is the analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on this issue after the annulment of the Data Retention Directive.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2020/0550-21792004231B.pdfcriminal proceduredata retentioneuropean unioncjeu
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bugarski Tatjana D.
Pisarić Milana M.
spellingShingle Bugarski Tatjana D.
Pisarić Milana M.
Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
criminal procedure
data retention
european union
cjeu
author_facet Bugarski Tatjana D.
Pisarić Milana M.
author_sort Bugarski Tatjana D.
title Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
title_short Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
title_full Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
title_fullStr Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
title_full_unstemmed Data eetention in CJEU Case Law
title_sort data eetention in cjeu case law
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Possession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and timely access of authorized competent state bodies to such data is without a doubt a useful tool in the fight against modern forms of crime. For that reason, it is justified to establish an obligation for providers of electronic communications services to keep certain data on communications for a certain period of time in the realization of which they mediate and to hand over that data at the request of authorized state bodies, in order to use them for legitimate purposes. For this reason, the Data Retention Directive was adopted in 2006, which Member States were required to transpose into national law. However, data retention poses a risk to basic human rights and freedoms, if the regulation establishing this obligation does so without respecting the essence of these rights and freedoms, especially the right to privacy and rights related to the processing of personal data, for which reason the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive invalid is 2014. Despite this decision, Member States continue to regulate the obligation to retain data in their national regulations. In this regard, the question of compliance of these regulations with the fundamental rights and freedoms and principles of the Union is raised. The subject of the paper is the analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on this issue after the annulment of the Data Retention Directive.
topic criminal procedure
data retention
european union
cjeu
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2020/0550-21792004231B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bugarskitatjanad dataeetentionincjeucaselaw
AT pisaricmilanam dataeetentionincjeucaselaw
_version_ 1721293985559871488