Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef

The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed <em>ad libitum</em> a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and ce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Flaviana Gottardo, Sandro Tenti, Flavio Da Ronch, Aziza Boukha, Marta Brscic, Giulio Cozzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2010-11-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/1786
id doaj-a5fb46320f884d0d8a87d0b5a9746809
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5fb46320f884d0d8a87d0b5a97468092020-11-25T01:17:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2010-11-0194e77e7710.4081/ijas.2010.e77Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beefFlaviana GottardoSandro TentiFlavio Da RonchAziza BoukhaMarta BrscicGiulio CozziThe study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed <em>ad libitum</em> a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereals grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on <em>Longissimus thoracis</em> muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 <em>vs</em> 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 <em>vs</em> 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 <em>vs</em> 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 <em>vs</em> 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 <em>vs</em> 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 <em>vs</em> 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 <em>vs</em> 3.66 % of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 <em>vs</em> 0.10 % of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and &omega;-3 (0.44 <em>vs</em> 0.30 % of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/1786Beef cattle, Organic production, Pasture grazing, Growth performance, Meat quality.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Flaviana Gottardo
Sandro Tenti
Flavio Da Ronch
Aziza Boukha
Marta Brscic
Giulio Cozzi
spellingShingle Flaviana Gottardo
Sandro Tenti
Flavio Da Ronch
Aziza Boukha
Marta Brscic
Giulio Cozzi
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Beef cattle, Organic production, Pasture grazing, Growth performance, Meat quality.
author_facet Flaviana Gottardo
Sandro Tenti
Flavio Da Ronch
Aziza Boukha
Marta Brscic
Giulio Cozzi
author_sort Flaviana Gottardo
title Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_short Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_full Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_fullStr Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_sort comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
publishDate 2010-11-01
description The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed <em>ad libitum</em> a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereals grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on <em>Longissimus thoracis</em> muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 <em>vs</em> 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 <em>vs</em> 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 <em>vs</em> 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 <em>vs</em> 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 <em>vs</em> 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 <em>vs</em> 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 <em>vs</em> 3.66 % of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 <em>vs</em> 0.10 % of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and &omega;-3 (0.44 <em>vs</em> 0.30 % of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production.
topic Beef cattle, Organic production, Pasture grazing, Growth performance, Meat quality.
url http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/1786
work_keys_str_mv AT flavianagottardo comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT sandrotenti comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT flaviodaronch comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT azizaboukha comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT martabrscic comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT giuliocozzi comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
_version_ 1725145516602294272