Impact of Ethnicity on Tibial Morphometrics Relevant to Total Ankle Replacement

• Main Authors: Jeffrey Bischoff PhD, Sarah L. Brownhill PhD, Sandra F. Snyder BS, Pascal Rippstein MD, Terrence M. Philbin DO, J. Chris Coetzee MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-08-01
• Series: Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00200

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement (TAR) success has improved since first-generation implants, but patient satisfaction continues to be less than knee and hip replacements. Little is known about variations in distal tibia anatomy between genders and across ethnicities; therefore it is unclear the extent to which current TAR prostheses accommodate variability in patient size and shape. This study quantified distal tibia morphometrics relevant to TAR design, and assessed differences between ethnicities and genders. The hypotheses were: (1) The anterior-posterior (AP) location of the dwell point of the tibia is centralized; (2) The sagittal radius of curvature of the tibial articulation increases with bone size; (3) Differences in dwell point location or sagittal radii between genders and ethnicities can be attributed to size differences between those populations. Methods: Tibial CT scans were obtained from cadavers or individuals of various ethnicities (Table 1). Landmarks were defined on digital models created from the scans, including medial and lateral edges of the distal tibial articulation (Figure 1a), and sagittal contours of the articulation (Figure 1b). The articulation center was defined as the average center point of all contours (Figure 1c). The AP center and AP length at the level of a distal tibial resection for TAR were determined, and the AP offset of the articulation center was calculated (Figure 1c). Differences in metrics for each ethnic and gender group were determined using a one-way Anova (P< .05) with Tukey’s method for differentiating groups. Regression fits of AP offset, average medial radius, and average lateral radius were determined. Utilizing AP length as a covariate, ANCOVA was utilized to assess differences in AP offset and sagittal radii between gender and ethnic groups (P< .05). Results: Descriptive statistics for AP length, AP offset, and medial/lateral radii are shown in Table 1, with Tukey groupings assigned. The relationship between medial and lateral radius was not consistent across all groups. AP length was a significant covariate for medial and lateral radii, but not AP offset. The relationship between lateral radius and AP length was significantly impacted by ethnicity (P< .001), but not by gender (P=.067) (Figure 2a). Medial radius versus AP length was significantly impacted by both ethnicity (P=.01) and gender (P< .03) (Figure 2b). Conclusion: This study illustrates for the first time the complexity of anatomical variation of the distal tibia across ethnic groups and between genders. The location of the articulation center is invariant to tibia size across each ethnicity. Medial and lateral sagittal radii generally increase with bone size, but the relative radii of the medial and lateral compartments are not consistent across ethnicities. These results highlight the need for increased anatomic understanding of the distal tibia, and implications on TAR design and technique.