Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny

The objective of this research was to investigate the influence of maternal prepartum dietary carbohydrate source on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of offspring. Angus-based cows were assigned to either a concentrate-based diet or forage-based diet during mid- and late...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin R. Gubbels, Janna J. Block, Robin R. Salverson, Adele A. Harty, Warren C. Rusche, Cody L. Wright, Kristi M. Cammack, Zachary K. Smith, J. Kyle Grubbs, Keith R. Underwood, Jerrad F. Legako, Kenneth C. Olson, Amanda D. Blair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/9/2056
id doaj-a61b09dab5c243d08978e317f57e4b2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a61b09dab5c243d08978e317f57e4b2b2021-09-26T00:09:11ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582021-08-01102056205610.3390/foods10092056Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of ProgenyErin R. Gubbels0Janna J. Block1Robin R. Salverson2Adele A. Harty3Warren C. Rusche4Cody L. Wright5Kristi M. Cammack6Zachary K. Smith7J. Kyle Grubbs8Keith R. Underwood9Jerrad F. Legako10Kenneth C. Olson11Amanda D. Blair12Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USAHettinger Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Hettinger, ND 58639, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USAThe objective of this research was to investigate the influence of maternal prepartum dietary carbohydrate source on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of offspring. Angus-based cows were assigned to either a concentrate-based diet or forage-based diet during mid- and late-gestation. A subset of calves was selected for evaluation of progeny performance. Dry matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), gain to feed (G:F), and ultrasound measurements (muscle depth, back fat thickness, and intramuscular fat) were assessed during the feeding period. Carcass measurements were recorded, and striploins were collected for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), trained sensory panel, crude fat determination and fatty acid profile. Maternal dietary treatment did not influence (<i>p</i> > 0.05) offspring BW, DMI, ultrasound measurements, percent moisture, crude fat, WBSF, or consumer sensory responses. The forage treatment tended to have decreased (<i>p</i> = 0.06) 12th rib backfat compared to the concentrate treatment and tended to have lower (<i>p</i> = 0.08) yield grades. The concentrate treatment had increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) <i>a</i>* and <i>b</i>* values compared to the forage treatment. These data suggest variation in maternal diets applied in this study during mid- and late-gestation has limited influence on progeny performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/9/2056beefcarcass characteristicscarbohydrate sourcefetal programmingmaternal nutritionmeat quality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin R. Gubbels
Janna J. Block
Robin R. Salverson
Adele A. Harty
Warren C. Rusche
Cody L. Wright
Kristi M. Cammack
Zachary K. Smith
J. Kyle Grubbs
Keith R. Underwood
Jerrad F. Legako
Kenneth C. Olson
Amanda D. Blair
spellingShingle Erin R. Gubbels
Janna J. Block
Robin R. Salverson
Adele A. Harty
Warren C. Rusche
Cody L. Wright
Kristi M. Cammack
Zachary K. Smith
J. Kyle Grubbs
Keith R. Underwood
Jerrad F. Legako
Kenneth C. Olson
Amanda D. Blair
Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
Foods
beef
carcass characteristics
carbohydrate source
fetal programming
maternal nutrition
meat quality
author_facet Erin R. Gubbels
Janna J. Block
Robin R. Salverson
Adele A. Harty
Warren C. Rusche
Cody L. Wright
Kristi M. Cammack
Zachary K. Smith
J. Kyle Grubbs
Keith R. Underwood
Jerrad F. Legako
Kenneth C. Olson
Amanda D. Blair
author_sort Erin R. Gubbels
title Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
title_short Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
title_full Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
title_fullStr Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Maternal Carbohydrate Source (Concentrate-Based vs. Forage-Based) on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Progeny
title_sort influence of maternal carbohydrate source (concentrate-based vs. forage-based) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of progeny
publisher MDPI AG
series Foods
issn 2304-8158
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The objective of this research was to investigate the influence of maternal prepartum dietary carbohydrate source on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of offspring. Angus-based cows were assigned to either a concentrate-based diet or forage-based diet during mid- and late-gestation. A subset of calves was selected for evaluation of progeny performance. Dry matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), gain to feed (G:F), and ultrasound measurements (muscle depth, back fat thickness, and intramuscular fat) were assessed during the feeding period. Carcass measurements were recorded, and striploins were collected for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), trained sensory panel, crude fat determination and fatty acid profile. Maternal dietary treatment did not influence (<i>p</i> > 0.05) offspring BW, DMI, ultrasound measurements, percent moisture, crude fat, WBSF, or consumer sensory responses. The forage treatment tended to have decreased (<i>p</i> = 0.06) 12th rib backfat compared to the concentrate treatment and tended to have lower (<i>p</i> = 0.08) yield grades. The concentrate treatment had increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) <i>a</i>* and <i>b</i>* values compared to the forage treatment. These data suggest variation in maternal diets applied in this study during mid- and late-gestation has limited influence on progeny performance.
topic beef
carcass characteristics
carbohydrate source
fetal programming
maternal nutrition
meat quality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/9/2056
work_keys_str_mv AT erinrgubbels influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT jannajblock influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT robinrsalverson influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT adeleaharty influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT warrencrusche influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT codylwright influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT kristimcammack influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT zacharyksmith influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT jkylegrubbs influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT keithrunderwood influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT jerradflegako influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT kennethcolson influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
AT amandadblair influenceofmaternalcarbohydratesourceconcentratebasedvsforagebasedongrowthperformancecarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofprogeny
_version_ 1717366874084212736