The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist

Bell’s stated assumptions in deriving his inequality were sufficient conditions. It is shown that a far simpler condition exists for derivation of the inequality: the mere existence of finite data sets regardless of their statistical or deterministic characteristics. When explicitly computing variou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sica Louis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-09-01
Series:Open Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0066
id doaj-a625b7516d814a1a8477dcf7d6e9d15b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a625b7516d814a1a8477dcf7d6e9d15b2021-09-05T13:59:34ZengDe GruyterOpen Physics2391-54712017-09-0115157758510.1515/phys-2017-0066phys-2017-0066The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they existSica Louis0Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA & Burtonsville, MD, 20866, USABell’s stated assumptions in deriving his inequality were sufficient conditions. It is shown that a far simpler condition exists for derivation of the inequality: the mere existence of finite data sets regardless of their statistical or deterministic characteristics. When explicitly computing various quantum correlations, the non-commutation of some observables must be taken into account. The resulting variation in correlations among the observables leads to satisfaction of the Bell inequality. Bell’s mistaken assumption of the same functional form for all correlations is the principal reason for inequality violation. Upon correction of this error, it is no longer necessary to invoke non-locality or non-reality to explain violation of the Bell inequality.https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0066bell’s theorembell inequalitynon-commutationnon-localityhidden variables03.65.ta
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sica Louis
spellingShingle Sica Louis
The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
Open Physics
bell’s theorem
bell inequality
non-commutation
non-locality
hidden variables
03.65.ta
author_facet Sica Louis
author_sort Sica Louis
title The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
title_short The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
title_full The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
title_fullStr The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
title_full_unstemmed The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
title_sort ultimate loophole in bell’s theorem: the inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Physics
issn 2391-5471
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Bell’s stated assumptions in deriving his inequality were sufficient conditions. It is shown that a far simpler condition exists for derivation of the inequality: the mere existence of finite data sets regardless of their statistical or deterministic characteristics. When explicitly computing various quantum correlations, the non-commutation of some observables must be taken into account. The resulting variation in correlations among the observables leads to satisfaction of the Bell inequality. Bell’s mistaken assumption of the same functional form for all correlations is the principal reason for inequality violation. Upon correction of this error, it is no longer necessary to invoke non-locality or non-reality to explain violation of the Bell inequality.
topic bell’s theorem
bell inequality
non-commutation
non-locality
hidden variables
03.65.ta
url https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0066
work_keys_str_mv AT sicalouis theultimateloopholeinbellstheoremtheinequalityisidenticallysatisfiedbydatasetscomposedof1sassumingmerelythattheyexist
AT sicalouis ultimateloopholeinbellstheoremtheinequalityisidenticallysatisfiedbydatasetscomposedof1sassumingmerelythattheyexist
_version_ 1717813419991629824