Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.

According to the complementary learning systems (CLS) account of word learning, novel words are rapidly acquired (learning system 1), but slowly integrated into the mental lexicon (learning system 2). This two-step learning process has been shown to apply to novel word forms. In this study, we inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frauke van der Ven, Atsuko Takashima, Eliane Segers, Ludo Verhoeven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437978?pdf=render
id doaj-a6317df682c64be28e5c59cfb9b41149
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6317df682c64be28e5c59cfb9b411492020-11-25T02:04:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012492610.1371/journal.pone.0124926Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.Frauke van der VenAtsuko TakashimaEliane SegersLudo VerhoevenAccording to the complementary learning systems (CLS) account of word learning, novel words are rapidly acquired (learning system 1), but slowly integrated into the mental lexicon (learning system 2). This two-step learning process has been shown to apply to novel word forms. In this study, we investigated whether novel word meanings are also gradually integrated after acquisition by measuring the extent to which newly learned words were able to prime semantically related words at two different time points. In addition, we investigated whether modality at study modulates this integration process. Sixty-four adult participants studied novel words together with written or spoken definitions. These words did not prime semantically related words directly following study, but did so after a 24-hour delay. This significant increase in the magnitude of the priming effect suggests that semantic integration occurs over time. Overall, words that were studied with a written definition showed larger priming effects, suggesting greater integration for the written study modality. Although the process of integration, reflected as an increase in the priming effect over time, did not significantly differ between study modalities, words studied with a written definition showed the most prominent positive effect after a 24-hour delay. Our data suggest that semantic integration requires time, and that studying in written format benefits semantic integration more than studying in spoken format. These findings are discussed in light of the CLS theory of word learning.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437978?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frauke van der Ven
Atsuko Takashima
Eliane Segers
Ludo Verhoeven
spellingShingle Frauke van der Ven
Atsuko Takashima
Eliane Segers
Ludo Verhoeven
Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Frauke van der Ven
Atsuko Takashima
Eliane Segers
Ludo Verhoeven
author_sort Frauke van der Ven
title Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
title_short Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
title_full Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
title_fullStr Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
title_full_unstemmed Learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
title_sort learning word meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description According to the complementary learning systems (CLS) account of word learning, novel words are rapidly acquired (learning system 1), but slowly integrated into the mental lexicon (learning system 2). This two-step learning process has been shown to apply to novel word forms. In this study, we investigated whether novel word meanings are also gradually integrated after acquisition by measuring the extent to which newly learned words were able to prime semantically related words at two different time points. In addition, we investigated whether modality at study modulates this integration process. Sixty-four adult participants studied novel words together with written or spoken definitions. These words did not prime semantically related words directly following study, but did so after a 24-hour delay. This significant increase in the magnitude of the priming effect suggests that semantic integration occurs over time. Overall, words that were studied with a written definition showed larger priming effects, suggesting greater integration for the written study modality. Although the process of integration, reflected as an increase in the priming effect over time, did not significantly differ between study modalities, words studied with a written definition showed the most prominent positive effect after a 24-hour delay. Our data suggest that semantic integration requires time, and that studying in written format benefits semantic integration more than studying in spoken format. These findings are discussed in light of the CLS theory of word learning.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437978?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT fraukevanderven learningwordmeaningsovernightintegrationandstudymodalityeffects
AT atsukotakashima learningwordmeaningsovernightintegrationandstudymodalityeffects
AT elianesegers learningwordmeaningsovernightintegrationandstudymodalityeffects
AT ludoverhoeven learningwordmeaningsovernightintegrationandstudymodalityeffects
_version_ 1724942055074955264