Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Classification Criteria: A New Tool

Study DesignCase-control study.PurposeTo design a new tool for classifying lumbar spinal canal stenosis (CLSCS).Overview of LiteratureGrading of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is controversial.MethodsThe Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the neurogenic claudication outcome score...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parisa Azimi, Hassan Reza Mohammadi, Edward C. Benzel, Sohrab Shahzadi, Shirzad Azhari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2015-06-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-399.pdf
Description
Summary:Study DesignCase-control study.PurposeTo design a new tool for classifying lumbar spinal canal stenosis (CLSCS).Overview of LiteratureGrading of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is controversial.MethodsThe Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the neurogenic claudication outcome score (NCOS) were recorded. Four parameters, which indicate the severity of LSCS disease, including Hufschmidt-grade, grading of magnetic resonance imaging, self-paced walking test, and stenosis ratio (SR) were employed. For the SR, quartile analysis was applied for classifying LSCS and the Hufschmidt-grade was modified into a 4-grade score. An initial score was assigned to each metric based on the severity of LSCS. Using the inverse-variance weighting method, the relative weights of these domains and their categories were determined. The score for all of the cases was obtained based on their weight by summing up the points of the four variables. Quartile analysis was used and a CLSCS score was proposed. Finally, intra- and interobserver reliability, and validity were assessed.ResultsA total of 357 patients were studied. The final CLSCS score for each case ranged from 4 to 16.5. Based on the quartile analysis, using the new criteria set, the CLSCS score was divided into four categories: CLSCS<7 (grade 0); 7≤CLSCS<10 (grade 1); 10≤CLSCS<13 (grade 2); and 13≤CLSCS≤16.5 (grade 3). The kappa values of for the CLSCS score indicated a perfect agreement. The CLSCS was correlated with the ODI and NCOS. All patients with grade 3 CLSCS were observed in the surgical group.ConclusionsThe CLSCS score can be helpful for classifying LSCS patients and in the decision-making process.
ISSN:1976-1902
1976-7846