The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anil Gulani, Sher Singh Yadav, Vinay Tomar, Shivam Priyadarshi, Vivek Kumar Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=Gulani
id doaj-a68808e7efa649b99748c3848908ce40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a68808e7efa649b99748c3848908ce402020-11-24T21:29:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342019-01-0111326526910.4103/UA.UA_142_17The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative studyAnil GulaniSher Singh YadavVinay TomarShivam PriyadarshiVivek Kumar SinghObjectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty randomized in 2 groups. In Group 1, donor-harvesting site was left open while in Group 2, donor site was closed. Self-made questionnaires were to assess postoperative pain, difficulty in tongue protrusion, swelling and numbness in graft harvest site, speech impairment, and difficulty in tolerating liquid and regular diet. Results: Mean visual analog scales score was 7.1 in Group 1, and 7.9 in Group 2 on day 0, which was statistically significant. Nearly 90.47% of patients in closure group and 95.23% in nonclosure group were able to swallow liquid diet on day 0 (P = 0.5604). On day 3, 95.71% of patients in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2 were able to swallow soft diet (P = 0.1604). Numbness was present in 80.95% Group 1 and 71.42% in Group 2 on day 0, which improved to 28.57% pts in Group 1 and 33.33% in Group 2 on day 3. On day 3, slurring of speech was more frequent in closure group (80%). However, at the end of a week, there was no difference in both groups. Saliva production was significantly increased in Group 1 in the 1st week. Conclusion: Long-term morbidities of closing or nonclosing the LMG donor site are similar, but in short term, there is less pain, less edema, early recovery of tongue movements in nonclosure groups.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=GulaniAugmentation urethroplastydonor sitelingual mucosaopen versus closed
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anil Gulani
Sher Singh Yadav
Vinay Tomar
Shivam Priyadarshi
Vivek Kumar Singh
spellingShingle Anil Gulani
Sher Singh Yadav
Vinay Tomar
Shivam Priyadarshi
Vivek Kumar Singh
The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
Urology Annals
Augmentation urethroplasty
donor site
lingual mucosa
open versus closed
author_facet Anil Gulani
Sher Singh Yadav
Vinay Tomar
Shivam Priyadarshi
Vivek Kumar Singh
author_sort Anil Gulani
title The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
title_short The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
title_full The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
title_fullStr The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
title_sort effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: a comparative study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Urology Annals
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty randomized in 2 groups. In Group 1, donor-harvesting site was left open while in Group 2, donor site was closed. Self-made questionnaires were to assess postoperative pain, difficulty in tongue protrusion, swelling and numbness in graft harvest site, speech impairment, and difficulty in tolerating liquid and regular diet. Results: Mean visual analog scales score was 7.1 in Group 1, and 7.9 in Group 2 on day 0, which was statistically significant. Nearly 90.47% of patients in closure group and 95.23% in nonclosure group were able to swallow liquid diet on day 0 (P = 0.5604). On day 3, 95.71% of patients in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2 were able to swallow soft diet (P = 0.1604). Numbness was present in 80.95% Group 1 and 71.42% in Group 2 on day 0, which improved to 28.57% pts in Group 1 and 33.33% in Group 2 on day 3. On day 3, slurring of speech was more frequent in closure group (80%). However, at the end of a week, there was no difference in both groups. Saliva production was significantly increased in Group 1 in the 1st week. Conclusion: Long-term morbidities of closing or nonclosing the LMG donor site are similar, but in short term, there is less pain, less edema, early recovery of tongue movements in nonclosure groups.
topic Augmentation urethroplasty
donor site
lingual mucosa
open versus closed
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=Gulani
work_keys_str_mv AT anilgulani theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT shersinghyadav theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT vinaytomar theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT shivampriyadarshi theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT vivekkumarsingh theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT anilgulani effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT shersinghyadav effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT vinaytomar effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT shivampriyadarshi effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
AT vivekkumarsingh effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy
_version_ 1725967487102615552