Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland

Border arrangements are often critical to the successful negotiation of peace settlements and the broader politics of post-conflict societies. However, developing an understanding of popular preferences about these arrangements is difficult using traditional surveys. To address this problem, we used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Morgan-Jones, Laura Sudulich, Feargal Cochrane, Neophytos Loizides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:Research & Politics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020929927
id doaj-a6a107b191044800926304a6d36a9b54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6a107b191044800926304a6d36a9b542020-11-25T03:56:50ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802020-07-01710.1177/2053168020929927Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern IrelandEdward Morgan-Jones0Laura Sudulich1Feargal Cochrane2Neophytos Loizides3School of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent, UKDepartment of Government, University of Essex, Colchester, UKSchool of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent, UKSchool of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent, UKBorder arrangements are often critical to the successful negotiation of peace settlements and the broader politics of post-conflict societies. However, developing an understanding of popular preferences about these arrangements is difficult using traditional surveys. To address this problem, we used a conjoint survey experiment to assess preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements in Northern Ireland. We mapped areas of convergence and divergence in the preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements of unionist and nationalist communities, simulated the degree of public support for politically plausible outcomes and identified the border arrangements that both communities could agree upon. In so doing, we outlined an empirical approach to understanding public preferences about border arrangements that could be used to understand the degree of support for similar institutional arrangements in other divided societies.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020929927
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward Morgan-Jones
Laura Sudulich
Feargal Cochrane
Neophytos Loizides
spellingShingle Edward Morgan-Jones
Laura Sudulich
Feargal Cochrane
Neophytos Loizides
Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
Research & Politics
author_facet Edward Morgan-Jones
Laura Sudulich
Feargal Cochrane
Neophytos Loizides
author_sort Edward Morgan-Jones
title Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
title_short Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
title_full Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
title_fullStr Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
title_full_unstemmed Citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Northern Ireland
title_sort citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies: evidence from a conjoint experiment in northern ireland
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research & Politics
issn 2053-1680
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Border arrangements are often critical to the successful negotiation of peace settlements and the broader politics of post-conflict societies. However, developing an understanding of popular preferences about these arrangements is difficult using traditional surveys. To address this problem, we used a conjoint survey experiment to assess preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements in Northern Ireland. We mapped areas of convergence and divergence in the preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements of unionist and nationalist communities, simulated the degree of public support for politically plausible outcomes and identified the border arrangements that both communities could agree upon. In so doing, we outlined an empirical approach to understanding public preferences about border arrangements that could be used to understand the degree of support for similar institutional arrangements in other divided societies.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020929927
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardmorganjones citizenpreferencesaboutborderarrangementsindividedsocietiesevidencefromaconjointexperimentinnorthernireland
AT laurasudulich citizenpreferencesaboutborderarrangementsindividedsocietiesevidencefromaconjointexperimentinnorthernireland
AT feargalcochrane citizenpreferencesaboutborderarrangementsindividedsocietiesevidencefromaconjointexperimentinnorthernireland
AT neophytosloizides citizenpreferencesaboutborderarrangementsindividedsocietiesevidencefromaconjointexperimentinnorthernireland
_version_ 1724463570548162560