Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

This paper analyses the comparative advantage of using silage maize or grass as feedstock for anaerobic digestion to biogas from a greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation point of view, taking into account site-specific yield potentials, management options, and land-use change effects. GHG emissions due to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Meyer-Aurich, Yulia Lochmann, Hilde Klauss, Annette Prochnow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/617
id doaj-a71da9749848439695c1f1c1ad563ec5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a71da9749848439695c1f1c1ad563ec52020-11-24T23:00:42ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502016-06-018761710.3390/su8070617su8070617Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas MitigationAndreas Meyer-Aurich0Yulia Lochmann1Hilde Klauss2Annette Prochnow3Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyThis paper analyses the comparative advantage of using silage maize or grass as feedstock for anaerobic digestion to biogas from a greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation point of view, taking into account site-specific yield potentials, management options, and land-use change effects. GHG emissions due to the production of biogas were calculated using a life-cycle assessment approach for three different site conditions with specific yield potentials and adjusted management options. While for the use of silage maize, GHG emissions per energy unit were the same for different yield potentials, and the emissions varied substantially for different grassland systems. Without land-use change effects, silage maize-based biogas had lower GHG emissions per energy unit compared to grass-based biogas. Taking land-use change into account, results in a comparative advantage of biogas production from grass-based feedstock produced on arable land compared to silage maize-based feedstock. However, under current frame conditions, it is quite unrealistic that grass production systems would be established on arable land at larger scale.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/617biogassilage maizegrasslandgreenhouse gasesland-use changelife cycle asssessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Meyer-Aurich
Yulia Lochmann
Hilde Klauss
Annette Prochnow
spellingShingle Andreas Meyer-Aurich
Yulia Lochmann
Hilde Klauss
Annette Prochnow
Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Sustainability
biogas
silage maize
grassland
greenhouse gases
land-use change
life cycle asssessment
author_facet Andreas Meyer-Aurich
Yulia Lochmann
Hilde Klauss
Annette Prochnow
author_sort Andreas Meyer-Aurich
title Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
title_short Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
title_full Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
title_fullStr Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
title_sort comparative advantage of maize- and grass-silage based feedstock for biogas production with respect to greenhouse gas mitigation
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2016-06-01
description This paper analyses the comparative advantage of using silage maize or grass as feedstock for anaerobic digestion to biogas from a greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation point of view, taking into account site-specific yield potentials, management options, and land-use change effects. GHG emissions due to the production of biogas were calculated using a life-cycle assessment approach for three different site conditions with specific yield potentials and adjusted management options. While for the use of silage maize, GHG emissions per energy unit were the same for different yield potentials, and the emissions varied substantially for different grassland systems. Without land-use change effects, silage maize-based biogas had lower GHG emissions per energy unit compared to grass-based biogas. Taking land-use change into account, results in a comparative advantage of biogas production from grass-based feedstock produced on arable land compared to silage maize-based feedstock. However, under current frame conditions, it is quite unrealistic that grass production systems would be established on arable land at larger scale.
topic biogas
silage maize
grassland
greenhouse gases
land-use change
life cycle asssessment
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/617
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasmeyeraurich comparativeadvantageofmaizeandgrasssilagebasedfeedstockforbiogasproductionwithrespecttogreenhousegasmitigation
AT yulialochmann comparativeadvantageofmaizeandgrasssilagebasedfeedstockforbiogasproductionwithrespecttogreenhousegasmitigation
AT hildeklauss comparativeadvantageofmaizeandgrasssilagebasedfeedstockforbiogasproductionwithrespecttogreenhousegasmitigation
AT annetteprochnow comparativeadvantageofmaizeandgrasssilagebasedfeedstockforbiogasproductionwithrespecttogreenhousegasmitigation
_version_ 1725641410549383168