The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities
Abstract Background Since 2005, the Australian Government has subsidized the production and distribution of Low Aromatic Fuel (LAF) as a deterrent against petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Indigenous communities. LAF is used in place of unleaded petrol as a fuel for vehicles and other engines. Th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13011-017-0121-6 |
id |
doaj-a71e455c1880466d854831c692282bb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a71e455c1880466d854831c692282bb92020-11-25T00:26:20ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2017-08-0112111210.1186/s13011-017-0121-6The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communitiesPeter d’Abbs0Gillian Shaw1Emma Field2Menzies School of Health ResearchNous GroupMenzies School of Health ResearchAbstract Background Since 2005, the Australian Government has subsidized the production and distribution of Low Aromatic Fuel (LAF) as a deterrent against petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Indigenous communities. LAF is used in place of unleaded petrol as a fuel for vehicles and other engines. This paper reports findings from an independent evaluation of the LAF rollout. Methods Forty one Indigenous communities were surveyed between 2010 and 2014, with each community being visited twice at a two yearly interval. Quantitative data on prevalence of petrol sniffing were collected, as well as qualitative data on the acceptability of LAF, evidence of substitution for inhaled petrol with other drugs, and programs such as recreational, training and employment opportunities. Prevalence rates of sniffing per 1000 population for each survey year and community were calculated by dividing the total number of sniffers by the population aged 5–39 years and multiplying by 1000. Results Between 2011–12 and 2013–14, the total estimated number of people sniffing petrol declined from 289 to 204, a fall of 29.4%. At both times, the median petrol sniffing prevalence rate was lower in communities with LAF than in communities without LAF. In 17 of the 41 communities, comparable data were available over a longer period, commencing in 2005–06. Fifteen of these communities stocked LAF over the entire period. In these communities, the median rate of petrol sniffing declined by 96%, from 141.6 per 1000 population in 2005–06 to 5.5 in 2013–14 (p < 0.05). LAF was widely accepted, although acceptance was often qualified by a belief that LAF harmed engines. Anecdotal reports suggest that the fall in petrol sniffing may have been offset by increased use of cannabis and other drugs, but the relationship is not one of simple cause-and-effect, with evidence that an increase in cannabis use in communities commenced before the LAF rollout began. Provision of services in communities has improved in recent years, but many programs continue to be inadequately resourced. Conclusions The rollout of LAF appears to have contributed to reducing petrol sniffing and associated harms in Australian Indigenous communities.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13011-017-0121-6Petrol sniffingGasoline sniffingInhalantsIndigenous healthSupply reductionLow aromatic fuel |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter d’Abbs Gillian Shaw Emma Field |
spellingShingle |
Peter d’Abbs Gillian Shaw Emma Field The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy Petrol sniffing Gasoline sniffing Inhalants Indigenous health Supply reduction Low aromatic fuel |
author_facet |
Peter d’Abbs Gillian Shaw Emma Field |
author_sort |
Peter d’Abbs |
title |
The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities |
title_short |
The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities |
title_full |
The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities |
title_fullStr |
The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (LAF) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Australian indigenous communities |
title_sort |
impact of subsidized low aromatic fuel (laf) on petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote australian indigenous communities |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
issn |
1747-597X |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Since 2005, the Australian Government has subsidized the production and distribution of Low Aromatic Fuel (LAF) as a deterrent against petrol (gasoline) sniffing in remote Indigenous communities. LAF is used in place of unleaded petrol as a fuel for vehicles and other engines. This paper reports findings from an independent evaluation of the LAF rollout. Methods Forty one Indigenous communities were surveyed between 2010 and 2014, with each community being visited twice at a two yearly interval. Quantitative data on prevalence of petrol sniffing were collected, as well as qualitative data on the acceptability of LAF, evidence of substitution for inhaled petrol with other drugs, and programs such as recreational, training and employment opportunities. Prevalence rates of sniffing per 1000 population for each survey year and community were calculated by dividing the total number of sniffers by the population aged 5–39 years and multiplying by 1000. Results Between 2011–12 and 2013–14, the total estimated number of people sniffing petrol declined from 289 to 204, a fall of 29.4%. At both times, the median petrol sniffing prevalence rate was lower in communities with LAF than in communities without LAF. In 17 of the 41 communities, comparable data were available over a longer period, commencing in 2005–06. Fifteen of these communities stocked LAF over the entire period. In these communities, the median rate of petrol sniffing declined by 96%, from 141.6 per 1000 population in 2005–06 to 5.5 in 2013–14 (p < 0.05). LAF was widely accepted, although acceptance was often qualified by a belief that LAF harmed engines. Anecdotal reports suggest that the fall in petrol sniffing may have been offset by increased use of cannabis and other drugs, but the relationship is not one of simple cause-and-effect, with evidence that an increase in cannabis use in communities commenced before the LAF rollout began. Provision of services in communities has improved in recent years, but many programs continue to be inadequately resourced. Conclusions The rollout of LAF appears to have contributed to reducing petrol sniffing and associated harms in Australian Indigenous communities. |
topic |
Petrol sniffing Gasoline sniffing Inhalants Indigenous health Supply reduction Low aromatic fuel |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13011-017-0121-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterdabbs theimpactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities AT gillianshaw theimpactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities AT emmafield theimpactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities AT peterdabbs impactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities AT gillianshaw impactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities AT emmafield impactofsubsidizedlowaromaticfuellafonpetrolgasolinesniffinginremoteaustralianindigenouscommunities |
_version_ |
1725344557117210624 |